Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1054House OversightLegal Filing

The document discusses the government's argument that the District Court's response to a jury note d...

The document discusses the government's argument that the District Court's response to a jury note did not constructively amend the indictment, and that the evidence presented at trial was consistent with the charges in Counts Three and Four of the Indictment. It also references relevant case law and trial testimony.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1054
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses the government's argument that the District Court's response to a jury note did not constructively amend the indictment, and that the evidence presented at trial was consistent with the charges in Counts Three and Four of the Indictment. It also references relevant case law and trial testimony.

Tags

Constructive amendment of indictmentExtraneous information exceptionJury instructions and verdict
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.