Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1060House OversightLegal Filing

The document discusses Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentence, arguing that the evidence presente...

The document discusses Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentence, arguing that the evidence presented at trial was 'materially different' from the allegations in the indictment and that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable. The court disagrees, finding that Maxwell was not 'unfairly and substantially' prejudiced and that her sentence was reasonable. The court upholds Maxwell's sentence of 240 months' imprisonment.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1060
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentence, arguing that the evidence presented at trial was 'materially different' from the allegations in the indictment and that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable. The court disagrees, finding that Maxwell was not 'unfairly and substantially' prejudiced and that her sentence was reasonable. The court upholds Maxwell's sentence of 240 months' imprisonment.

Tags

Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentenceAllegations of sexual abuse and conspiracyProcedural reasonableness of Maxwell's sentence

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.