Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1136House OversightLegal Filing

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena...

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena, arguing that it is an improper attempt to obtain discovery beyond what is required under Rule 16 and Brady. The law firm contends that Maxwell's requests lack specificity as required by United States v. Nixon.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1136
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena, arguing that it is an improper attempt to obtain discovery beyond what is required under Rule 16 and Brady. The law firm contends that Maxwell's requests lack specificity as required by United States v. Nixon.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Rule 17(c) subpoenaDiscovery obligationsSpecificity requirement for subpoenas

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.