Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1226House OversightLegal Filing

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, ...

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1226
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.

Tags

deposition limitsrelevance of testimonydefamation case

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.