Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1279House OversightOther

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorn...

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorney's 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby should be enforced, given that it led to Cosby's incriminating testimony in a civil deposition. The court ultimately decided that the decision not to prosecute must be enforced, which disposed of the appeal.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1279
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered Cosby's appeal, focusing on whether the District Attorney's 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby should be enforced, given that it led to Cosby's incriminating testimony in a civil deposition. The court ultimately decided that the decision not to prosecute must be enforced, which disposed of the appeal.

Tags

William Cosby's criminal trial and appealProsecutorial discretion and the decision not to prosecute Cosby in 2005Admissibility of prior bad act evidence

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.