Exhibit list to a declaration: doj-ogr-00009912
This document is an index of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration, listing various court records, criminal records, and lawsuit documents related to Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa. The exhibits cover a range of topics, including arrests, court proceedings, and lawsuits. The document provides a catalog of evidence or supporting materials for a larger case or filing.
Summary
This document is an index of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration, listing various court records, criminal records, and lawsuit documents related to Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa. The exhibits cover a range of topics, including arrests, court proceedings, and lawsuits. The document provides a catalog of evidence or supporting materials for a larger case or filing.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-30038-PAE
The document appears to be a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including records of Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa's criminal history, as well as documents related to a previous court case, Conrad v. Manessis.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03363-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf
Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida
deposition transcript: A-5736
The witness, Brune, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein on May 12th, and when they became aware of Ms. Trzaskoma's research. Brune clarifies their understanding of Ms. Trzaskoma's actions on May 12th and when they learned more about the investigation.
deposition: A-5771
The deponent is questioned about a document containing various addresses, lawsuits, and household information, including the identification of Robert J. Conrad as a spouse. The testimony confirms details about the document's content and the deponent's understanding of it. The document appears to be a subject of inquiry in a legal proceeding.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.