Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-14963House OversightOther

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case

The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015632
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincourt-confidentialitylegal-filingsconfidential-court-recordsalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-abuse-allegationssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answer are quoted in full— including Dershowitz’s reference to the oral sex allegation that he now argues this Court should treat as “confidential”: Q. [Y]ou [are] aware that years before December of 2014, when the CVRA pleading was filed, that your name had come up repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors, correct? . . . A. Let me answer that question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allegation. She claims under oath that she told you that secretly in 2011, but you have produced no notes of any such conversation. You, of course, are a witness to this allegation and will be deposed asa witness to this allegation. I believe it is an entirely false allegation that she told you in 2011 that she had had any sexual contact with me. I think she’s lying through her teeth when she says that. And I doubt that your notes will reveal any such information. But if she did tell you that, she would be absolutely, categorically lying. So I am completely aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with [REDACTED]. I know that it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a witness to any of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse. And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied. And I stand on the record. The record is clear that I have categorically denied I was ever a witness to any abuse, that | ever saw Jeffrey Epstein abusing anybody. And -- and the very idea that I would stand and talk to Jeffrey Epstein while he was receiving oral sex from [REDACTED], which she swore to under oath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I object. I object. I'm not going to allow you to reveal any conversations that happened in the context of a settlement discussion. THE WITNESS: Does she have standing?

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00800508

343p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you to the Oz Police for confirming ! Emotional Blackmail Re: Sunday School? : Mike Baker and Emily Steel NY Timm Re: Gayle King Re: Naughty Brad and Daniel Bates Re: Theme Tune J1 Song For Funeral Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:49:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: IMG_6895.jpeg Hi President Trump, The Securities Exchange and the FCA Please can you investigate Rishi Sunak and his financials including California! Also please can you get everything and all correspondence from Rishi Sunaks office (ie George). The case number is ZA52784 as in the screen shot. Why would Rishi sunak want all his emails deleted if my server? Mmmmmm! Please can you investigate this for me President Trump because this could have all been resolved in 2022!! I've suffered enough!! EFTA00144040 07:49 sic I St S R <® Arrest Sent: 4 Argil 2022 10: To: SUNAK. Rishi S

42p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH DEMOCRACY Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:08:24 #0000 Importance: Normal IMG_6895.Meg; IMG_6923.jpeg KEIR, DON'T YOU THINK ITS TIME THE BRITISH PUBLIC DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH?? JOBS ARE GOING TO BE LOST..... THE BRITISH PUBLIC THAT VOTED YOU IN DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH, OR IS BRITAIN NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY?? IF SO, AT LEAST BE HONEST ABOUT IT!!! THEY NEED TO KNOW ESPECIALLY AFTER IT WAS YOU WHILE PUBLICALLY CALLED DOR PRINCE ANDREW TO BE INVESTIGATED IN THE FIRST PLACE!! lifipaiLvanLiodosmdsolaukam pokialslamiraptoralimirmxspalgimpolire-b/47171611ml KEIR WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING?? REMEBER I RELINQUISHED MY BRITISH CITIZENSHIP BECAUSE OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT!! WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING!!! EFTA00144082 11:06* .a 1`. 0—> Post t KeirStarmerO @KeirStarmer There will be an economic impact from the decisions the US has taken. ••• We will continue to negotiate on a deal in our interests. Decisions will b

46p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00144597

From To EFTA00144597 Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Sweet Dreams... Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 06:07:08 +0000 Importance: Normal David Boies, Sergey Brin, Alan Dershowitz, Sigrid, Paul Cassell, Brad, Brittany, Stan, Goria and all involved in aiding and abetting, obstructing justice, rape and sex trafficking, including the media... GOTTCHA! CHECKMATE MOTHERFUCKERS, OR SHOULD I SAY KIDDIE FUCKERS! Hey Sergey? It gives me so much satisfaction knowing that most of you are sleeping soundly when I'm coming for every single one of you, and I mean every single one of you, and yes, that does include "journalists" and judges! I'M COMING .... SWEET DREAMS. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Monday, 4 November 2024 at 19:48, Dear Alina, wrote: We have never communicated, and I've never asked anything of you, but when the elections are over, can you please help file class actions on behalf of myself and ALL the Epstein against the Daily Mail, The Guardian, and every other British ne

1004p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.