Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15037House OversightOther

Email chain forwarding a Reuters lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein (April 2016)

The passage merely confirms that a Reuters‑related lawsuit was being circulated among lawyers in April 2016. It provides no new factual details, names of defendants beyond Epstein, transaction data, o Lawyers Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger were discussing a Reuters lawsuit against Je The email chain includes a forwarded message from David Ingram at Reuters attaching the suit. Date

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028970
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely confirms that a Reuters‑related lawsuit was being circulated among lawyers in April 2016. It provides no new factual details, names of defendants beyond Epstein, transaction data, o Lawyers Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger were discussing a Reuters lawsuit against Je The email chain includes a forwarded message from David Ingram at Reuters attaching the suit. Date

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinemail-correspondencereuters-lawsuitlegal-exposurelegal-documentshouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Alan Dershowitz PO Sent: 4/28/2016 4:51:57 PM To: Roy Black cc: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Jack Goldberger Po Subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein Importance: — High Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Roy Black {I wrote: Privileged - Redacted i i Deemer meme mememememememememememememseemememsmreemsmsememsmsms me memretmesereseemsmceseememseceemsmsemsecmemseemememeeemememeeceemsmsasaemememememememeaemsmemememsmemememememememsmemememememems: i From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM To: Alan M. Dershowitz; Roy Black; Jack Goldberger Subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein From: Martin Weinberg Date: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM Subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein To: Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> Begin forwarded message: Fron: Date: April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT To: Subject: RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein Sorry, the suit is attached to this email. From: Ingram, David (Reuters News) Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM To: ‘Martin G. Weinberg’ Subject: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein Hi Marty,

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Emailjeevacation@qmail.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 April 22, 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS la, Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Self-Report of Allegation of Conflict of Interest Dear Mr. I write to advise you that I have learned that lawyers for a target of one of my investigations, Jeffrey Epstein, have raised ethical concerns regarding my involvement in his potential prosecution in the Southern District of Florida. Specifically, I understand that Epstein's attorneys have notified Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher and/or her staff that I have an actual conflict of interest. As part of pre-indictment plea negotiations, the parties agreed that Epstein's victims would be allowed to collect civil damages from Epstein and that Epstein would provide counsel for the vict

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel

The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for

13p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain referencing a 2016 Reuters lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994

The passage provides a concrete lead: a federal lawsuit filed in California in 2016 that directly implicates former President Donald Trump and convicted financier Jeffrey Epstein in a serious criminal Federal lawsuit filed in California in early 2016 Allegation that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994 Reuters was preparing to publish a story on the suit

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.