Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15182House OversightOther

Attorneys seek to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement alleging U.S. Attorney’s Office violated victims’ rights

The passage outlines a legal motion claiming the U.S. Attorney’s Office concealed a 2007 non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, potentially reopening federal charges. While it identifies spec Motion filed in federal court (West Palm Beach) alleging CVRA violation by U.S. Attorney’s Office. Claims the office sent false notification letters to victims in Jan and May 2008 after signing the a

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013408
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines a legal motion claiming the U.S. Attorney’s Office concealed a 2007 non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, potentially reopening federal charges. While it identifies spec Motion filed in federal court (West Palm Beach) alleging CVRA violation by U.S. Attorney’s Office. Claims the office sent false notification letters to victims in Jan and May 2008 after signing the a

Tags

legal-motionjeffrey-epsteinvictim-rights-violationfederal-chargesus-attorneys-officenonprosecution-agreementlegal-exposurehouse-oversightpotential-financialpenalty-expvictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Home > Palm Beach News | Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein agreement thrown out A Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein agreement thrown out LATEST NEWS Today: Thursday, April 7, 2011 Talk at Sea Gull Cottage to focus on genomics Palm Beach Women’s International Film Festival debuts Thursday in support of women filmmakers Day Academy pupils revisit notable characters in Palm Beach history Gov. Scott at Midtown Beach: 'Give me the list," he tells officials about beach concerns By MICHELE DARGAN DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER Updated: 9:41 a.m. Wednesday, March 23, 2011 Posted: 7:21 p.m. Monday, March 21, 2011 E-mail | Print | Share | Larger Type Court papers filed Monday say the U.S. Attorney’s Office violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act by signing a nonprosecution agreement with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein without notifying his victims. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, want a court hearing, where they will ask that the agreement be invalidated because, they say, the victims’ rights were violated. If that happens, it could open up the 58-year-old Palm Beach billionaire to a slew of federal charges involving sex crimes with minors that were set aside by the agreement. The motion, filed Monday in federal court in West Palm Beach, accuses the U.S. Attorney’s Office of deliberately misleading the victims by telling them the investigation was ongoing, while concealing they had already signed a deal with Epstein. According to the motion, the U.S. Attorney’s Office sent “false notification” letters in January 2008 and May 2008 to the victims saying “(t)his case is currently under investigation” after the government had signed the agreement with Epstein in September 2007. “The only reason that the (U.S. Attorney's Office) concealed the existence of the non-prosecution agreement from the victims was not to comply with some legal restriction, but rather to avoid a firestorm of public controversy that would have erupted if the sweetheart plea deal with a politically connected billionaire had been revealed,” the motion says. If Epstein were found guilty on federal charges, statutory penalties ranged from 10 years to life. Instead, the sealed pact was part and parcel of Epstein’s acceptance of a state plea deal, where he received an 18-month sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. He served 13 months segregated in a vacant wing of the county stockade and was let out on work release six days a week for up to 16 hours a day. Edwards and other attorneys fought in court for a year before successfully getting the agreement unsealed in September 2009. More than 30 minor girls were identified as Epstein’s victims in the pact. http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news /attorneys—-want-jeffrey-epstein-agreement-thrown-out-1338111.html 4/7/11 1:37 PM Palm Beach, FL H: 84° L: 71° Forecast | Set Location Feels Like: 85° | SEARCH ® Site © Web Web Search by YAHOO! PALM BEACH ESTATE wi Pr be © He 241 La Puerta Way, Palm Beach Exquisitely designed Mediterranean Palm Beach walled estate. al corcoran.com as Je % 3 TOWN OF PALM BEACH \/ 1911+ CENTENNIAL + 2011 \/ ID Click here for the latest events! ID Find us on Facebook 2,413 people like Palm Beach Daily News. PA aN Palm Beach Daily News Like Stanton Jackie Todd Diana Joe 4 ?, SS Goharians James Karen i Facebook social plugin MOST RECENT ALBUMS The Palm Beach Pamella Roland Opera The Society of the Four Arts benefit Page 1 of 3

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaincorcoran.com
URLhttp://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Government's Position on Page Limits

From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Government's Position on Page Limits Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:46:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, You are welcome. The Southern District of Florida Local Rules do not distinguish between civil and criminal proceedings when it comes to the page length of a memorandum of law. S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(c)(2) limits a legal memorandum to twenty pages. The government has no objection to petitioners seeking leave to file a legal memorandum exceeding the page limitation by approximately fifteen pages. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda March 17, 2011 08:40 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Government's Position on Page Limits Dear 1. Thank you for the information sent today. 2. What is the Government's position on the page limits applicable to our "summary judgment" pleading — do you believe we are under the civil rules? Or under the criminal rules? Do you believe that we need to file a separate motion for a roughly 35 page pleading with roughly 19 pa

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
Court UnsealedDepositionJul 31, 2020

[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016

Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI

89p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.