Judge to rule on sealed plea-deal papers today

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00201180 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 2 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. EFTA00201181 Case 9:08-cv-80811-K

FD.302(Ftev.5440

FD.302(Ftev.5440 -1 of 8- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 02/09/2021 LARRY VISOSKI (VISOSKI), was interviewed pursuant to a proffer agreement via video conference with hos attorneys Glen McGorty, Daniel Zelenko and Danielle Giffuni present. Also present via video was Assistant United States Attorneys , Detective and Special Agent . After being advised of the identities of the above listed individuals and the nature of the interview, there was a discussion about the proffer agreement. VISOSKI states that he understands the proffer agreement, signs the document and shows it to the camera. VISOSKI then provides the following information: VISOSKI went to high school in . He then went to community college in Broward County for a year and a half. After that he went to aircraft mechanic trade school in Miami. He learned how to fly while being a mechanic. VISOSKI worked for JEFFREY EPSTEIN from July of 1991 until 2O19. He currently maintains his planes and h

EFTA01326054

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

House Oversight Inquiry Email Chain Linking Epstein, Maxwell, and Potential Clinton Flight

The document contains a set of questions from a journalist to a public‑relations lawyer that reference specific alleged crimes, subpoena requests for a list of minors, and a direct query about whether Brad Edwards subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell for a list of all girls who visited Epstein’s homes or fle Maxwell allegedly kept a computer database of hundreds of girls and scheduled their visits. Jane D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT, REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IF FACTS ARE CONTESTED, AND REQUEST FOR HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COMES NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that their rights as crime victims under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) have been repeatedly violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, to request an evidentiary hearing to establish those violations if the U.S. Attorney's Office contests the underlying facts, and to request a brief schedule and a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. As recounted in more detail below, the victims have recently-obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffre