Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15326House OversightOther

Opinion piece linking Sarah Palin's statements to a misunderstanding of causation

The passage is an editorial commentary on Sarah Palin's remarks about readiness for the presidency, offering no concrete allegations, new facts, financial flows, or actionable leads involving powerful The text critiques Palin's view of preparedness for presidential office. It discusses generic beliefs about governors, mayors, and regulators being ready for presidency. No mention of transactions, l

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023897
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is an editorial commentary on Sarah Palin's remarks about readiness for the presidency, offering no concrete allegations, new facts, financial flows, or actionable leads involving powerful The text critiques Palin's view of preparedness for presidential office. It discusses generic beliefs about governors, mayors, and regulators being ready for presidency. No mention of transactions, l

Tags

presidential-readinesspolitical-commentarysarah-palinhouse-oversightcausation-theory

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Defining Intelligence 157 guess that she doesn’t think about causation because no one ever tried to get her to do so. So she may very well be smart but she sounds stupid because she seems to be unaware of her own causal reasoning and is not very good at it. Being good at understanding causation and figuring what could possibly cause what and why is a hallmark of intelligence. Intelligence can be enhanced by practicing the cognitive processes that are the basis of intelligent behavior and intelligent reasoning. One of these hallmark processes is certainly causation. We could make Miss South Carolina smarter by teaching her how to determine what causes what and asking her to figure things out and explain them to others using a causation model that she could defend. Of course, it would have been better if this process started when she was a small child. Now, with that in mind, let’s look at the Palin remark. Palin was asked about her readiness for the office of vice president, which isn’t much of an office really. What was really being asked was her readi- ness for the presidency, which was not unreasonable to worry about considering John McCain’s age. She responded in a way that made clear that she has no understanding of causation either. In the statements above, she asserted (implicitly) the following beliefs about causation: Any mayor or city manager is ready to be president. Any governor is ready to be president. Any commissioner is ready to be president. Any regulator of gas and oil is ready to be president. If you have a vision of energy independence, you are ready to be president. Now, of course, one of these beliefs is, in fact, shared by the country since we have chosen governors to be president. But the other beliefs are simply wrong. No one thinks that having a vision of energy in- dependence prepares you to be president or that being an oil and gas regulator prepares you to be president. So, what does Palin misunderstand here? She doesn’t get the idea of preparedness as causation. Having a degree in accounting prepares you to be an accountant, most would agree. We believe, as a society, in certain rites of passage preparing you for the next step. Palin apparently has never thought about this or why anyone would hold such beliefs.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.