Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
more efficiently by machines. The successful creation of AGI would be the biggest event
in human history, so why is there so little serious discussion of what it might lead to?
Here again, the answer involves multiple reasons.
First, as Upton Sinclair famously quipped, “It is difficult to get a man to
understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”!” For
example, spokesmen for tech companies or university research groups often claim there
are no risks attached to their activities even if they privately think otherwise. Sinclair’s
observation may help explain not only reactions to risks from smoking and climate
change but also why some treat technology as a new religion whose central articles of
faith are that more technology is always better and whose heretics are clueless
scaremongering Luddites.
Second, humans have a long track record of wishful thinking, flawed
extrapolation of the past, and underestimation of emerging technologies. Darwinian
evolution endowed us with powerful fear of concrete threats, not of abstract threats from
future technologies that are hard to visualize or even imagine. Consider trying to warn
people in 1930 of a future nuclear arms race, when you couldn’t show them a single
nuclear explosion video and nobody even knew how to build such weapons. Even top
scientists can underestimate uncertainty, making forecasts that are either too optimistic—
Where are those fusion reactors and flying cars?—or too pessimistic. Ernest Rutherford,
arguably the greatest nuclear physicist of his time, said in 1933—less than twenty-four
hours before Leo Szilard conceived of the nuclear chain reaction—that nuclear energy
was “moonshine.” Essentially nobody at that time saw the nuclear arms race coming.
Third, psychologists have discovered that we tend to avoid thinking of disturbing
threats when we believe there’s nothing we can do about them anyway. In this case,
however, there are many constructive things we can do, if we can get ourselves to start
thinking about the issue.
What can we do?
I’m advocating a strategy change from “Let’s rush to build technology that makes us
obsolete—what could possibly go wrong?” to “Let’s envision an inspiring future and
steer toward it.”
To motivate the effort required for steering, this strategy begins by envisioning an
enticing destination. Although Hollywood’s futures tend to be dystopian, the fact is that
AGI can help life flourish as never before. Everything I love about civilization is the
product of intelligence, so if we can amplify our own intelligence with AGI, we have the
potential to solve today’s and tomorrow’s thorniest problems, including disease, climate
change, and poverty. The more detailed we can make our shared positive visions for the
future, the more motivated we will be to work together to realize them.
What should we do in terms of steering? The twenty-three Asilomar principles
adopted in 2017 offer plenty of guidance, including these short-term goals:
(1) An arms race in lethal autonomous weapons should be avoided.
(2) The economic prosperity created by AI should be shared broadly, to benefit all
of humanity.
7 Upton Sinclair, , Candidate for Governor: And How I Got Licked (Berkeley CA: University of
California Press, 1994), p. 109.
66
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016869