Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-15771House OversightOther

Jane Doe #3’s affidavit falsely claims former President Bill Clinton was on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, citing it to implicate Professor Alan Dershowitz

The passage links a former U.S. President and a high‑profile attorney to the Epstein island narrative, suggesting possible misconduct and providing a specific false claim that could be investigated fo Jane Doe #3 alleges Bill Clinton was present on Epstein’s private island during her own presence. The claim is presented in an affidavit filed in case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM. The allegation is used to bol

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010743
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage links a former U.S. President and a high‑profile attorney to the Epstein island narrative, suggesting possible misconduct and providing a specific false claim that could be investigated fo Jane Doe #3 alleges Bill Clinton was present on Epstein’s private island during her own presence. The claim is presented in an affidavit filed in case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM. The allegation is used to bol

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincredibility-assessmentaffidavitcourt-filingforeign-influencebill-clintonalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancesexual-misconduct-allegationshouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 9 of 19 Fifth, Jane Doe #3 claims that she needed to include Prof. Dershowitz in her filing because her CVRA claim of “unfair” treatment “implicates a fact-sensitive equitable defense which must be considered in the factual context of the entire interface between Epstein, the relevant prosecutorial authorities and the federal offense victims.” The “facts” to which this “defense” is sensitive, even if Jane Doe #3 is allowed to intervene, are the interactions between the prosecutors and Jane Doe #3, and not anything pertinent to Prof. Dershowitz personally. Nor are attorney-client communications between Epstein and his counsel at issue, or the proper subject of discovery in this action under any scenario. Ill. Jane Doe #3’s Efforts to Bolster Her Lies About Prof. Dershowitz Are Remarkably Thin Setting aside the utter irrelevancy of the allegations against Prof. Dershowitz, having created an international imbroglio by their ill-conceived libels of Prof. Dershowitz, one would expect that Jane Doe #3 would be able to muster at least some credible support for their allegations. Yet the two “incontestable” facts she leads with in support of her claim that Prof. Dershowitz is a serial sex abuser are (1) that Mr. Epstein and Prof. Dershowitz were friends; and (2) Prof. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein’s house. Of course, these supposedly “incontestable” facts are evidence of nothing. In the affidavit she submitted to this court, Jane Doe #3’s lack of credibility is readily apparent. She has now sworn under oath, repeating a fragrant lie that she had previously sold to a British newspaper: namely that “former President Bill Clinton was present on the island [Jeffrey Epstein’s private island] at a time when [Jane Doe #3] was also present on the island.” (DE 291-1 at § 53.) In this easily discredited fabrication’, Jane Doe #3 expounded in imaginative * The name of the publication is intentionally omitted as Jane Doe # 3 reveals her identity 9

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01481462

TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPANY SEARCH Page 2 PUBLICATIONS Pages 3-6 OFAC Pages 7-25 EFTA01481462 COMPANY SEARCH K THIS IS NOT A STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING t HYPERLINK "https://sos-res.state.de.us/tin/FieldDesc.jsp" \l "FILE NUMBER" \t "none" UFile Number:U 4251036 B HYPERLINK "https://sos- res.state.de.us/tin/FieldDesc.jsp" \l "INCORPORATION DATE OR FORMATION DATE" \t "none" RIncorporation Date / Formation Date:2 11/14/2006A(mm/dd/yyyy) U HYPERLINK "https://sos-res.state.de.us/tin/Fie

111p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH

45p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alan Dershowitz Denies Underage Sex Allegations by [REDACTED - Survivor] Amid Epstein Settlement

The passage provides a specific denial by a high‑profile attorney (Dershowitz) of alleged underage sexual contact, referencing travel records and FBI statements. While it mentions notable figures (Cli Dershowitz publicly refutes [REDACTED - Survivor]' claim of underage sex with him. He cites travel records and FBI findings to support his alibi. Roberts' allegations were reportedly withdrawn.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.