Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-16167House OversightOther

Casual email chain discussing personal travel plans and island ownership

The passage contains informal correspondence between Lawrence Krauss and a private individual about vacation plans and a personal island in the Bahamas. It lacks concrete allegations, financial detail Krauss mentions owning an island in the Bahamas. Conversation is about inviting a celebrity (Johnny Depp) to the Caribbean. No mention of government officials, financial transactions, or wrongdoing.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025636
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains informal correspondence between Lawrence Krauss and a private individual about vacation plans and a personal island in the Bahamas. It lacks concrete allegations, financial detail Krauss mentions owning an island in the Bahamas. Conversation is about inviting a celebrity (Johnny Depp) to the Caribbean. No mention of government officials, financial transactions, or wrongdoing.

Tags

personal-assetsocial-connectionproperty-ownershipinformal-correspondencepersonal-travelhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Lawrence Krauss 9/18/2015 6:26:27 PM jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Re: an article you may both hate. or like. DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A5OEC.png Importance: High When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands..:) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist., his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great. Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: , Assistant (Jessica): Origins Office (Cynthia): origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu Mil Origins PROJECT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY On Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Lawrence Krauss <111). wrote: Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism. Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): Origins Office (Cynthia): origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu <DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A5OEC.png> Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total. On confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of "American exceptionalism" or "Israeli self-defense" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it. But I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a "transcendental purpose," and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn't matter because the facts are just "abuse of history" while real history is "the evidence of history as our minds reflect it," then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters. On Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case. Noam From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto: ] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM To: Noam Chomsky jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Subject: an article you may both hate. or like. hope all is well. Lawrence http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica) Origins Office (Cynthia origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Technical Artifacts (8)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainkrauss.faculty.asu.edu
Domainorigins.asu.edu
Domaintwitter.com
Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Emailjeeyacation@gmail.com
Phone287-1404
Phone866543-7401
URLhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.