This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude ex...
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
Summary
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Sihlo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 14, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with a list of names, places, and relevant entities, for purposes of examining prospective jurors during voir dire. This letter is respectfully requested to be filed under seal to protect the privacy of witnesses and third parties. I. List of Names The following is a list of names that jurors may hear at trial: • Juan Alessi • Maria Alessi • • Janusz Banasiak • • Daniel Besselsen • • • • Michael Buscemi EFTA00040231 Page 2 • • Tracy Chappell • • Dr. Park Dietz
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghisla...
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, fe...
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, featuring testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts are expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence and expert opinions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Defense on November 1, 2021, noticed eight expert witnesses. Def. Br., Ex. 1 ("Notice"). Two of those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has already addressed that motion. On November 15, 2021, the Government moved to fully or partially preclude the testimony of the remaining six experts. The Defense filed a response on November 19, 2021. The Court addresses the motion to preclude Dr. Hall in this separate opinion. It will address the other five e
FIADDON
FIADDON MORGAN FOREMAN November 1, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Paglitica 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com JPagliuca@hmflaw.com Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell through counsel, submit the following summary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). I. EXPERT DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENSE A. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Dr. Loftus is the Distinguished Professor of Psychological Science and Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Dr. Loftus is one of the nation's leading experts on the science of memory. In addition to her experience as an academic and clinical researcher, she has been an expert witness or consultant in hundreds of cases. Her extensive experience and credentials are recited in her curric
EFTA00014701
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.