Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-16221House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein named defendant in a 2008 civil sexual assault case filed by a Jane Doe in Palm Beach County

The document confirms a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein for sexual assault filed in 2008, providing a concrete case number, jurisdiction, and plaintiff anonymity. While it offers a verifiable legal Case number 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM filed in U.S. District Court, Palm Beach County, FL Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein; Plaintiff: Jane Doe No. 3 (anonymous) Cause of action: Diversity action under 28 U.S.C. §

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012649
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document confirms a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein for sexual assault filed in 2008, providing a concrete case number, jurisdiction, and plaintiff anonymity. While it offers a verifiable legal Case number 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM filed in U.S. District Court, Palm Beach County, FL Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein; Plaintiff: Jane Doe No. 3 (anonymous) Cause of action: Diversity action under 28 U.S.C. §

Tags

civil-lawsuitjeffrey-epsteincourt-filingpalm-beach-countycivil-litigationsexual-assaultlegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Digunet Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM DocurfelMlk COMERGHRE ED Docket 03/05/2008 The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service ng or other page Sas 8 ofS by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judiciat Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initlating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN (a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 3, ) (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF PALM BEACH COUNTY (EXCEPT IN U.S, PLAINTIFF CASES) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) (c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Bivd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160, (305) 931-2200 {d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH tl. BASIS OF JURISDICTION lI. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR Pence (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) (For Diversity Case Only) ; AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF DEF Incorporated of Principal Place of Q4 a4 0 1. U.S. Government O 3. Federal Question Cilizen of This State x1 01 . Business in This State Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of Another State ' Q2 x2 . Incorporated and Principal Placeof Q5 O05 O 2. US. Government X 4. Diversity Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country Q 3 0 3 Busingss in Another State Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item nN) Forelgn Nation QO6 O86 iV. CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT \Va._5_ days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case V. NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY) A CONTRACT A TORTS B FORFEITURE A BANKRUPTCY A OTHER STATUS PENALTY 0422 Appeal 28 USC 158 0 400 Status Reappointment i 6 410 Antitrust 03423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157 1 430. Banks and Banking EB a0 Commerce/lCC Rates/etc. B Deportation A PROPERTY RIGHTS 5 70 Racketaer Intuenced and Corrupt Organizations G 810 Selective Service © 110Msurance PERSONAL INJURY 1810 Agricultura %20Marine (1 820 Other Food & Drug OF 130Miler Act 0825 Drug Related Seizure 0310 Aplano 1382 Personal InfuryMed Matpractice 0 315 Auplane Product Liability 1365 Personal InfuryProduc Liability 320 Assault, Libel & Slander (0368 Asbestos Personnel ederal Employers’ Liabfity Injury Product Llabilay O 14QNegotiable Instrument of Properly 21 USC 881 O 150Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcemant of Judgment 0650 Aline Regs 0880 Occupational $51 Medicare Act D tSzRecaveryof elated 7 PERSONAL PROPERTY Safetyhealth 2820 Copyrights 850 Securities! Commodities! Student Loans (Exc) 11680 Other (830 Patent Exchange Q 840 Trademark © 675 Customer Challange Veterans) B O 153 Racovery of Overpayment of Vetcran’s Benefits 8° 12USC3410 D 881 Agricultural Acts D 882 Economic Stabiitation Act O 883 Environmental Matters a B64 Enemy Allocation Act 0 885 Freedom of Information Act 0 800 Appeafof Fee Determination dee! saul Actess to 0371 Truth in Lending B 0380 Other Personne? Property Damage 0965 Property Damage Product Liability X 380 Other Parsonat Injury is} (ep stocknoiiers Sule O 4000ther Contra a BS Contact Produce Uabtiy . B SOCIAL SECURITY 881 HIA (1985ff) 01862 Black Lung (823) 0.883 DIWC/DIWW (405(9)) 2864 SSID Tile XVI 1865 RSI (405(9)) Oo 950 Carcusorenyel’sae O 240 Land Condemnation D 441Votng © 540Motions to Vacate Sentenca X710 Far Labor Standards. Statutes O 220 Forecasure B © 442Employment Habeas Corpus. Act © 880 Other Statutory Actions” O 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment QO 443HousingiAccommodatons G §30Genaral” 0 720 Labor Management "Aord D 240 Torts to Land D0 446 Welfare (2) $35Death Panalty Relations B A FEDERAL TAX SUITS O 245 Ton Product Liabilty G 4400ther Civil Rights O 540 Mandamus & Other 0730 Labar Management Declaratory relaf and stale law claims O 290 All Other Real Property © S550CMi Rights for defamation Raporting & Disclosure Act © 740 Ralhway Labor Act © 780 Other Labor Lilgalion 0751 Employee Ret. inc, Security Aci B “AorB 870 Taxes (U.S. Plainiltf or Oefendant) 471 IRS-Third Party 28 USC 7808 Vi. ORIGIN x1. Original 0 2. Removed from 03.Remanded from 4. Refilled 6. Multidistrict Litigation O7. Appeal to District Judge from Proceeding State Court Appellate Court 01 5. Transferred from another district (Specify) Magistrate Judgment GLARENGE MAB Vil. REQUESTED CHECK IF THIS IS A O CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ QO Check she Aded ubx YES iN COMPLAINT O UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 complaint: JURY DEMAND: . go NO Vill. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein 3-W-O*€ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Recelpt No. REV. 9/94 Date Paid: I 24 R64 6of6

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80232-KAM
Phone(305) 931-2200
SWIFT/BICCONTRACT
SWIFT/BICGLARENGE

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01308033

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660122

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.