Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-16567House OversightDeposition

Deposition excerpts suggest Alan Dershowitz was present at Jeffrey Epstein’s home during alleged massage incidents

The passage contains direct references to Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, and alleged encounters with young women at Epstein’s residence. While the text is a fragmented deposition excerpt and lacks Witness questioned about Dershowitz’s presence at Epstein’s home during a massage session. The witness claims no recollection of the specific incident, creating ambiguity. The deposition is being use

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010812
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains direct references to Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, and alleged encounters with young women at Epstein’s residence. While the text is a fragmented deposition excerpt and lacks Witness questioned about Dershowitz’s presence at Epstein’s home during a massage session. The witness claims no recollection of the specific incident, creating ambiguity. The deposition is being use

Tags

dershowitzwitness-testimonylegal-depositionlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightepsteincourt-proceedingssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
wo On Nu fF Ww NN NM NNN PHP PP RP BP oe Bp UR WD HF OW MOAN HUBWNP OO 293 excerpts out of a deposition to try to imply something when there's other parts that totally are inconsistent with that. And if you're going to do that, then he has the ability under our rules to review the entire transcript of the deposition and that's what I'm permitting him to do, just like when we're in court. MR. SCAROLA: What I ain doing, Mr. Scott -- what | am doing, Mr. Scott -- MR. SCOTT: Have you read that now, sir? MR. SCAROLA: -- is reviewing the evidence that was relied upon by Bradley Edwards and by Paul Cassell in coming to the conclusion that the allegations that had been made by Virginia Roberts were, in fact, credible allegations. MR. SCOTT: And I'm -- MR. SCAROLA: Because your own client has acknowledged that this is information that was available to both him and to them back in 2009. MR. SCOTT: And what I am doing is showing him portions of the same deposition that totally take a different position from this witness from what you have read, so that this record is a complete record and not a partial record with your inference only. And I feel wo orn AU BP WN NNNNN NFP FPP BP HPP BP eB Be uP WNOrF OM ON HOB WNP O that that's totally appropriate. If we were in a courtroom, a judge would permit him to do it. So you have your position and I have mine. MR. SWEDER: Can we have the witness read that? BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Do you recall the following testimony having been given in that same deposition? "Question: Allright. This is follow-up to questioning by Ms. Ezell. Ms. Ezell asked you about Mr. Dershowitz being present in Mr. Epstein's home, and I think you said -- I think you said Mr. Epstein and he and Mr. Dershowitz were friends? “Answer: Yes. “Question: She also, I think, asked was Mr. Dershowitz ever there when one of the young women who gave a massage was present in the home. “Answer: I don't remember that. "Question: That's where I want to clear up. Is it your testimony that Mr. Dershowitz was there when any of the women came to Mr. Epstein's home to give a massage? "Answer: Yes." wow on nm bP WN NN NN NN FP RP FP RP RP RP RP RP OP oH mW NY FP oO fo MAI HO FP WN FP Oo 295 Do you remember that testimony having been given? A. lassume that when your clients used the transcript as a basis for their false conclusion that I was guilty, they read the whole transcripts, not just the -- BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Every word. MR. SCOTT: Don't interrupt him. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. You don't need to assume that. 1 will stipulate they read every word. MR. SCOTT: Mr. Scarola, he's speaking. You don't have a right to do this. A. And if you read every word, you will see that it's totally exculpatory, that I have no idea whether there were any young women in one part of the house when I was in another part of the house. It's completely consistent with my testimony that | have never seen any underage women. Let's see. And if you read the whole transcript, you'll see, | think: "Was Dershowitz ever there when one of the woman gave a Massage? "I don't remember that. wnornonau fF WN NN NN NYP PP PY PP Oe eo PWN eH OW AANA UM BWNHRH OO "Were you in -- were you in any way attempting in your response to imply that Mr. Dershowitz had a massage by one of these young ladies? "T don't know, sir. "You have no knowledge? "No, sir. "And you certainly weren't implying that that occurred; you just have no knowledge, correct? “Answer: I don't know." And I would hope that your clients would be reading the whole thing in context, unlike what you've tried to do to try to create a false impression that this testimony in any way exculpates me. I have to say if this is what they relied on, my confirmation of their unethical and unprofessional conduct has been strongly corroborated by that and you're helping my case. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Would it have been reasonable for Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell to have relied upon the detailed reports of Palm Beach police department? A. 1 don't know. I don't know what the Palm 30 (Pages 293 to 296) www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.phippsreporting.com
Phone(888) 811-3408

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you to the Oz Police for confirming ! Emotional Blackmail Re: Sunday School? : Mike Baker and Emily Steel NY Timm Re: Gayle King Re: Naughty Brad and Daniel Bates Re: Theme Tune J1 Song For Funeral Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:49:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: IMG_6895.jpeg Hi President Trump, The Securities Exchange and the FCA Please can you investigate Rishi Sunak and his financials including California! Also please can you get everything and all correspondence from Rishi Sunaks office (ie George). The case number is ZA52784 as in the screen shot. Why would Rishi sunak want all his emails deleted if my server? Mmmmmm! Please can you investigate this for me President Trump because this could have all been resolved in 2022!! I've suffered enough!! EFTA00144040 07:49 sic I St S R <® Arrest Sent: 4 Argil 2022 10: To: SUNAK. Rishi S

42p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
Court UnsealedDepositionJul 31, 2020

[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016

Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI

89p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH DEMOCRACY Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:08:24 #0000 Importance: Normal IMG_6895.Meg; IMG_6923.jpeg KEIR, DON'T YOU THINK ITS TIME THE BRITISH PUBLIC DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH?? JOBS ARE GOING TO BE LOST..... THE BRITISH PUBLIC THAT VOTED YOU IN DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH, OR IS BRITAIN NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY?? IF SO, AT LEAST BE HONEST ABOUT IT!!! THEY NEED TO KNOW ESPECIALLY AFTER IT WAS YOU WHILE PUBLICALLY CALLED DOR PRINCE ANDREW TO BE INVESTIGATED IN THE FIRST PLACE!! lifipaiLvanLiodosmdsolaukam pokialslamiraptoralimirmxspalgimpolire-b/47171611ml KEIR WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING?? REMEBER I RELINQUISHED MY BRITISH CITIZENSHIP BECAUSE OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT!! WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING!!! EFTA00144082 11:06* .a 1`. 0—> Post t KeirStarmerO @KeirStarmer There will be an economic impact from the decisions the US has taken. ••• We will continue to negotiate on a deal in our interests. Decisions will b

46p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.