Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1658House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a court filing arguing that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, did not violate Federa...

The document is a court filing arguing that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, did not violate Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(A) by not disclosing a photograph used during cross-examination of a prosecution witness. The filing interprets the rule and cites case law to support the argument that disclosure is not required for evidence used during the government's case-in-chief.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1658
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a court filing arguing that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, did not violate Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(A) by not disclosing a photograph used during cross-examination of a prosecution witness. The filing interprets the rule and cites case law to support the argument that disclosure is not required for evidence used during the government's case-in-chief.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Interpretation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(A)Disclosure obligations of defendants in a criminal trialAdmissibility of evidence during cross-examination
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.