Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1659House OversightLegal Filing

The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell object to the government's overly broad proposal to prot...

The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell object to the government's overly broad proposal to protect the anonymity of certain witnesses, arguing it would unfairly constrain Maxwell's ability to confront her accusers. The defense notes inconsistencies between the government's proposal and their own direct examination of a witness. The attorneys agree to remain mindful of protecting witness anonymity while reserving the right to confront their accusers.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1659
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell object to the government's overly broad proposal to protect the anonymity of certain witnesses, arguing it would unfairly constrain Maxwell's ability to confront her accusers. The defense notes inconsistencies between the government's proposal and their own direct examination of a witness. The attorneys agree to remain mindful of protecting witness anonymity while reserving the right to confront their accusers.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Protecting anonymity of testifying witnessesGovernment's proposal to restrict cross-examinationConfrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.