The document is a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor at NYU, providing expert opinion o...
The document is a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor at NYU, providing expert opinion on the ethical obligations of lawyers involved in a case before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gillers concludes that the lawyers had no ethical obligation to disclose certain information at various stages of the proceedings. The declaration discusses the relevant New York Rules of Professional Conduct and applies them to the facts of the case.
Summary
The document is a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor at NYU, providing expert opinion on the ethical obligations of lawyers involved in a case before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gillers concludes that the lawyers had no ethical obligation to disclose certain information at various stages of the proceedings. The declaration discusses the relevant New York Rules of Professional Conduct and applies them to the facts of the case.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01378454
Court Filing - Index of Exhibits: 1:20-cr-00380
This document is an index of exhibits filed in the case against David Parse, including affidavits, transcripts, letters, and sentencing memoranda. The exhibits span from 2012 to 2013 and cover various aspects of the case, including sentencing and restitution. The document provides a roadmap to the key filings in the case.
Court Filing or Exhibit: A-5859
The document details Stephen Gillers' employment history and lists his testimony before various congressional committees on topics such as habeas corpus reform and the nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court.
EFTA Document EFTA01379764
EFTA01379764
court filing or legal exhibit: A-5855
The document appears to be an exhibit or filing in a court case, containing a list of publications by Stephen Gillers, including articles on legal ethics and professional responsibility. The list highlights Gillers' expertise in the field and may be used to establish his credibility or provide evidence in the case. The document is likely part of a larger filing or exhibit collection.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.