Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1669House OversightLegal Filing

The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epst...

The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1669
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Admissibility of photographic evidenceAuthentication of evidenceRelevance and potential prejudice of evidence under Rules 401 and 403
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.