Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1693House OversightLegal Filing

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an...

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1693
Pages
1
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Tags

Juror misconduct and potential grounds for a new trialAttorney-client privilege and its application to witness testimonyInteractions between attorneys and government agents
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Mixed court documents: 544

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP December 10, 2021 BY EMAIL. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Pursuant to the Court's Order dated June 2, 2021 (Dkt. 297), we write to provide the government with the list of potential defense witnesses. Included on the list are three attorneys: Brad Edwards, Robert Glassman, and Jack Scarola. Pursuant to the Court's instruction, we will brief any privilege issues to the Court before offering their testimony. We would also like the opportunity to confer about stipulations concerning their testimony and the testimony of other witnesses. Finally, we reserve the right to add or substitute witnesses as we further define the defense case. 1. • 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Task Force Office 9. Lucy Mary Clive 10. Dr. Park Dietz 2063779.1 EFTA00156482 December 10, 2021 Page 2 11. 12. 13. Brad Edwards (atto

2p
Court UnsealedDepositionJul 31, 2020

[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016

Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI

89p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00018441

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 545

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.

9p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Giuffre Exhibits

Case 18-2868, Document 286, 08/09/2019, 2628248, Pagel of 55 EXHIBIT Case 18-2868, Document 286, 08/09/2019, 2628248, Page2 of 55 United States District Court Southern District Of New York --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------X ............................................... Virginia L. Giuffre, 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S INITIAL F.R.C.P. 26(a)(1)(A) DISCLOSURES P

55p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.