Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1697House OversightLegal Filing

The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the gover...

The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1697
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Limitation on expert testimonySuggestive questioning during witness interviewsRelevance of Dr. Loftus's testimony on memory science
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.