Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-17105House OversightOther

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing with vague questioning

The passage contains only generic courtroom dialogue without any specific names, allegations, transactions, or actionable details linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no concrete leads for Witness is instructed to look at camera for jury viewing. General question about seriousness of allegations and investigation scope.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021837
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains only generic courtroom dialogue without any specific names, allegations, transactions, or actionable details linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no concrete leads for Witness is instructed to look at camera for jury viewing. General question about seriousness of allegations and investigation scope.

Tags

court-transcriptoversight-hearinghouse-oversightprocedural

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 14 a little bit unnatural for you to be responding to questions that are being asked immediately to your right and not be looking directly at the examiner the entire time, but because this is being videotaped, it might be helpful if you can, to the extent that you're able, to look into the camera so that the jury for whom this may be played -- THE WITNESS: I see. MR. SCAROLA: -- at a later time gets to see your full face. THE WITNESS: All right. I hope you won't consider me rude then -- MR. SIMPSON: I will not consider -- it's good advice from your counsel and I will not consider you rude. THE WITNESS: Thank you. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. I want to ask you some more questions about the scope of investigation. Would you agree that an allegation of serious misconduct by another person generally requires more investigation than a lesser serious type of allegation? A. Sure. That's a fair statement. Q. And so, for example, before accusing a person ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.