Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-17131House OversightOther

Steve Bannon’s personal grievances and ideological musings while in the White House

The passage is a narrative description of Bannon’s feelings and worldview with no specific allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑profile individuals (Trump, Bannon, P Bannon expressed hatred for his role in the Trump campaign and White House. He claimed to be the only staffer committed to radical change. He described the U.S. as split into hostile peoples, framing

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020013
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a narrative description of Bannon’s feelings and worldview with no specific allegations, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑profile individuals (Trump, Bannon, P Bannon expressed hatred for his role in the Trump campaign and White House. He claimed to be the only staffer committed to radical change. He described the U.S. as split into hostile peoples, framing

Tags

steve-bannondonald-trumpwhite-housepolitical-ideologyinternal-staff-dynamicshouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
13 BANNON AGONISTES e, too, felt like a prisoner, he had told Katie Walsh when she came to tell him she was leaving. By ten weeks in, Steve Bannon’s mastery of the Trump agenda, or at least of Trump himself, appeared to have crumbled. His current misery was both Catholic in nature—the self-flagellation of a man who believed he lived on a higher moral plane than all others— and fundamentally misanthropic. As an antisocial, maladjusted, post-middle-aged man, he had to make a supreme effort to get along with others, an effort that often did not go well. Most especially, he was miserable because of Donald Trump, whose cruelties, always great even when they were casual, were unbearable when he truly turned against you. “T hated being on the campaign, I hated the transition, I hate being here in the White House,” said Bannon, sitting one evening in Reince Priebus’s office, on an unseasonably warm evening in early spring, with the French doors open to the arbor-covered patio where he and Priebus, now firm friends and allies in their antipathy toward Jarvanka, had set an outdoor table. But Bannon was, he believed, here for a reason. And it was his firm belief—a belief he was unable to keep to himself, thus continually undermining his standing with the president—that his efforts had brought everybody else here. Even more important, he was the only person showing up for work every day who was committed to the purpose of actually changing the country. Changing it quickly, radically, and truly. The idea of a split electorate—of blue and red states, of two opposing currents of values, of globalists and nationalists, of an establishment and populist revolt—was media shorthand for cultural angst and politically roiled times, and, to a large degree, for business as usual. But Bannon believed the split was literal. The United States had become a country of two hostile peoples. One would necessarily win and the other lose. Or one would dominate while the other would become marginal. This was modern civil war—Bannon’s war. The country built on the virtue and the character and the strength of the American workingman circa 1955—65 was the ideal he

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Steve Bannon <I

5p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02518013

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01615550

7p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01656066

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Trump meets with top health‑care executives at Mar‑a‑Lago amid ACA repeal push

The passage lists specific senior executives from major medical institutions and two billionaire CEOs meeting the president‑elect, suggesting possible influence on health‑care policy. It provides name Meeting took place on Dec. 28, 2016 at Mar‑a‑Lago, Palm Beach. Attendees included CEOs of Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Partners HealthCare, Cleveland Clini No donors to Trump’s campaign among

4p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.