Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-17645House OversightOther

Academic analysis of prosecutorial bias and under‑enforcement in U.S. criminal justice

The passage discusses scholarly perspectives on conflicts of interest, racial bias, and under‑enforcement in police and prosecutorial contexts. It does not provide concrete new allegations, names, tra Highlights conflict‑of‑interest concerns when prosecutors evaluate police misconduct. Notes historical patterns of bias against minorities, undocumented immigrants, sex workers, and LGBT Cites propos

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016517
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses scholarly perspectives on conflicts of interest, racial bias, and under‑enforcement in police and prosecutorial contexts. It does not provide concrete new allegations, names, tra Highlights conflict‑of‑interest concerns when prosecutors evaluate police misconduct. Notes historical patterns of bias against minorities, undocumented immigrants, sex workers, and LGBT Cites propos

Tags

police-misconductbias-investigationunderenforcementracial-disparitypolicy-recommendationprosecutorial-biaslegal-exposurecriminal-justice-reformhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 8 of 42 103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *856 group), and favoritism toward the class of perpetrators, law enforcement officers. 4° In the ordinary organization of criminal justice systems, those cases call on officials from one law enforcement agency to assess the evidence against officials from another, even when the agencies regularly work together. +! As in the context of local public corruption, conflict-of-interest rules 42 are far from adequate to prevent prosecutors from making judgments in light of such professional relationships and circumstances. 43 The possibility of partiality is inevitable. When [*857] that possibility combines with the long history of racial disparities in U.S. criminal justice administration, widespread suspicion of non-prosecution decisions in cases of police violence against minority civilians is hardly surprising, as the Black Lives Matter movement demonstrates. “4 4. Other Underenforcement Contexts Corruption, sexual assaults, and police violence illustrate the key causes and effects of failures to enforce criminal law, but the same forces are recognizably at work in other social contexts. Scholars and advocates have pointed to biases as explanations for inadequate law enforcement responses to offenses against undocumented aliens, sex workers, institutionalized persons, and targets of anti-LGBT hate crimes. * Complaints that police ignored wrongdoing against racial-minority victims in minority communities were prominent in the 1970s and 1980s. 4° Some of [*858] the remedies, however - which included harsher drug laws adopted with substantial support from African American politicians and communities - have proven deeply problematic for those same communities. 47 Finally, less pernicious biases and favoritism are suspected explanations for lenient enforcement patterns in lower-visibility contexts, such as bicyclists killed by motor vehicle drivers, ** employees injured on the job due to workplace safety violations, and bystanders shot by recreational hunters. +? Even critics of those enforcement decisions in those settings view them as products of subtle or unconscious empathy with vehicle drivers, employers, and recreational gun users, which incline officials 40 Prison guard assaults on inmates raise the same concerns, although they get less public attention. For a notorious failure to prosecute prison guards and law enforcement officials for unjustified lethal force, see generally Heather Ann Thompson, Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy (2016). 41 Cf. Paul Cassell, Who Prosecutes the Police? Perceptions of Bias in Police Misconduct Investigations and a Possible Remedy, Wash. Post: Vololkh Conspiracy Blog (Dec. 5, 2014), Attps:/Awww.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh -conspiracy/wp/2014/12/05/Awho-prosecutes-the- police-perceptions-of-bias-in-police-misconduct-investigations-and-a-possible-remedy (describing the problem of local prosecutors! handling police cases as a "perception of bias" rather than a "conflict of interest" and recommending state attorneys general handle police cases). One solution, followed in Wisconsin, is to assign investigation of deaths involving law enforcement officers to a state-level investigative agency unconnected to the local agency of the officer under investigation. Vis. Stat.§ $175.47, 950.04(1v) (do), 950.0822) (h) (2014). # E.g., Criminal Justice Standards 3-1.3 (A.B.A. 2015); ef. Braman v. Corbett, 19 A.3d 1151, 1154 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011) (describing a situation where a district attorney's office recused itself from decision to prosecute on a private complaint alleging the district attorney committed rape, and the state attorney general investigated and made the decision not to prosecute). 8 For a disturbing account of prosecutorial deference to police, see Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America's Largest Criminal Court 127-56 (2016); David A. Harris, The Interaction and Relationship Between Prosecutors and Police Officers in the United States, and How This Affects Police Reform Efforts, in The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective 54, 55, 60-63 (Erik Luna & Marianne Wade eds., 2012) (describing reasons why the prospect of police reform through the efforts of state prosecutors is "bleak"); Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, Chicago's Racist Cops and Racist Courts, N.Y. Times (Apr. 14, = 2016), https ://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/15/opinion/chicagos-racist-cops-and-racist-courts.html; see also Kate Levine, The Ultimate Conflict, Slate (Sept. 11, 2014), Attp:/Avww.slate.com/articles/news and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/09/local_prosecutor_bob_meculloch_should_ not_be_the_one_to_decide_whether_to.html. For a harrowing account of a federal prosecutor who did not show deference to fellow law enforcement officials and faced apparent retaliation for it, see Paul Butler, Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice 1-21 (2009). DAVID SCHOEN

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainavww.slate.com
Domainawww.washingtonpost.com
Domainwww.nytimes.com
Phone950.0822

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Law Review Article Discusses Enforcement Redundancy and Under‑enforcement in U.S. Criminal Justice

The passage is a scholarly analysis of prosecutorial discretion, under‑enforcement, and the role of federal‑state redundancy. It contains no specific allegations, transactions, dates, or names of indi Identifies ‘enforcement redundancy’ (federal‑state overlap, private prosecution, judicial review) as Notes that federal prosecutors often step in when state prosecutors decline to charge, especially

111p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Are you free to call Paul Cassell now?

From: To: Subject: RE: Are you free to call Paul Cassell now? Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:58:02 +0000 Importance: Normal I did. She was driving and her phone was cutting out. I just sent her an emailing explaining how this all intersects and told her to hold off about making anymore contact wit o as to try to keep criminal vs. civil cases as separate as possible. From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) (Ann.Marie.C.Villafana©usdoj.gov] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:35 PM To: Pryor, Christina Jo Subject: RE: Are you free to call Paul Cassell now? Did you tell her that is not a victim? Eshould only be classified as a witness. Assistant U.S. Attorne 500 E. Broward Blvd, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33394 From: Pryor, Christina Jo (FBI) Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 11:53 AM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Are you free to call Paul Cassell now? I just talked with She said had identified=as a victim and per procedure, she made an initial contact introduci

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition The passage references a claim that Alan Dershowitz disclosed a criminal extortion scheme involving unnamed clients during a deposition, and mentions related defamation lawsuits. While the details are vague and unverified, the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and a federal courtroom provides a concrete lead (date, location, parties) that could be pursued. The claim is moderately controversial and potentially sensitive, but it lacks clear novelty and specific financial details, limiting its score. Key insights: Dershowitz allegedly told lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell that "your clients were involved" in a criminal extortion plot.; The statement was made on October 15, 2015, during a deposition in Broward County, Florida.; Bradley and Cassell had sued Dershowitz for defamation, and Dershowitz had filed a countersuit.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: "Paul Cassell"

From: To: "Paul Cassell" Cc: ' "Brad Edwards" Subject: : ovemments osition on Several Pending Issues? Still Waiting for Answer Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:56:28 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, 1. Yesterday, I provided you with the name and phone number for OPR Acting Associate Counsel, who received your December 10, 2010 letter to Mr. Ferrer, asking for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution. 2. The government will not be making initial disclosures to plaintiffs, because we do not believe Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 applies to this matter. 3. The CVRA applies to the criminal case which has been filed in district court, where an individual is deemed to be a "victim," not any civil litigation which may be initiated to enforce those claimed rights. We do not believe there is any right to discovery in this case. Moreover, we do not believe that whatever Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez may have said to this office, or what this office said to Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann S

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.