Transcript coding dispute highlights alleged Epstein flight records and abuse evidence

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 H3VOGIU1 you are inclined to do them, you could not place them into evidence fairly without testimony regarding what all these codes on the transcripts mean, or at a bare minimum, the introduction of evidence and instruction that makes explicit what all the codes on the transcripts mean. Defendant either failed to do her due diligence on this and looked at what the codes are before advancing this argument, but either way, it's not a good faith argument because, as you can see in the document I handed up, these codes and their meanings were detailed at length in Ms. Giuffre's opposition to the motion for summary judgment, and I would ask the Court to refer to the facts at page 32 of the statement of facts. So what the records actually show is rampant truancy, years of absence from school while defendant was abusing her, which show ample opportunity for abuse, and are, in fact, in accord with the flight records, which have also been produced in this case, which place Ms. Giuffre on 23 flights with defendant aboard Jeffrey Epstein's private plane. So as these records actually show truancy, failed grades, failure to complete courses, these should be excluded under all the rules I cited earlier, or at a bare minimum, instruction to the jury about what the codes mean and detailing how many days of school Ms. Giuffre actually attended, a number that is conspicuously absent from defendant's brief. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011328