Alleged testimony linking Prince Andrew and US attorneys to Jeffrey Epstein plea negotiations

wow Om A Oh Pw DY BK NN NNN NY EY BP eH BP Pe RP PP Pp RP WO PWN HF Ow OYA MU BR WN BO wo Ow A MN FP WN NNNNN NFP RP RP RP Be ep Rp pp “Opwnh PP Ob OYA UM BwWN PHO 217 demonstrably false, but you could have easily discovered that the implication you were drawing was demonstrably false by simply taking one second and Googling her name as my wife did. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. And so at 25 years old, she wasn't a young woman? A. She was not the kind of woman that I was describing as underage. She was a mature, serious, I think I said in my public statements a model. 1 wasn't aware at the time that see was working for Victoria's Secrets, but Google demonstrates that. And I described her exactly, in exactly the right terms, a serious person. I always saw her dressed when I saw her -~- I saw her maybe on two or three occasions, dressed appropriately. She was a serious adult worker and I think you insult and demean her when you suggest that anything other than that she was a serious adult when she flew on that airplane. Q. You were asked on the occasion of that same Don Lemon CNN interview what possible motive the attorneys, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, could have had to have identified you in the pleading that was filed in the Crime Victim's Rights Act case. _ warn nw be wn Bb NNN NNN PRP BP Pe RP op BP Pp OB WN HF OU MAA KH FWN RO she has a history of lying, knowing that she is easily suggestible, and they basically pressured her, according to my sources, into including me when she didn't want to include me, because by including me, they could make a claim, false as it was, could make a false claim that a person who negotiated the NPA was also criminally involved with her. They also lied -- lied unethically and unprofessionally by saying that I negotiated that provision of the NPA, which gave me, myself, any kind of immunity from prosecution had I had improper sex with [REDACTED], which, of course, I did not. And that was one of the bases on which I was certain that they had engaged in unprofessional, disbarrable and unethical conduct by including that provision, as well as including a provision that Prince Andrew was included because he, Prince Andrew, pressured a United States attorney to try to get a good deal for Jeffrey Epstein. That is so laughable. How any lawyer could put that in a pleading, it doesn’t pass even the minimal giggle test. And I'm embarrassed for Professor Cassell that he would have signed his narne to a pleading that alleges that Prince Andrew would pressure the United States attorney for the Southern Do you remember that? A. That's right, yes. Q. And your response was, quote —- MR. SCOTT: Here's your transcript if you need to refer to it. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. - "They want to be able to challenge the plea agreement and I was one of the lawyers who organized the plea agreement. I got the very good deal for Jeffrey Epstein." Did you make that response? A. Yes. Q. So, you recognized as of January 5, 2015, that the reason why the statements were filed in the Crime Victim's Rights Act case was because the Crime Victim's Rights Act case had, as an objective, setting aside the plea agreement that you had negotiated for Jeffrey Epstein, correct? MR. SCOTT: Objection, form. Go ahead if you can answer it. A. There were multiple motives. One of the motives was crassly financial. They were trying to line their pockets with money. But as I also said, and I said this over and over again, they profiled me. They sat down with their client, knowing that wow Oy A MW BP WD BP NNN NPP eH BP RP Pp pp PP WONHF OU ON DM BW ND BO N wn District of Florida into giving Jeffrey Epstein a good deal. MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike the unresponsive portions of the answer. And obviously the break didn't do any good. MR. SCOTT: Let's proceed. MR. SCAROLA: We're going to. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. You stated, quote: "If they," referring to Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, "could find a lawyer who helped draft the agreement" -—- A. Right. Q. -- "who also was a criminal having sex, wow, that could help them blow up the agreement." Did you make that statement on -- A. Yes. |} just repeated it now, yes, under oath, yes. Q. Did you state the following in that same interview: "So they," referring to Bradley Edwards, Paul Cassell and [REDACTED], "sat down together, the three of them, these two sleazy, unprofessional disbarrable lawyers" -- A. Uh-huh, uh-huh. Q. -- "they said" -- MR. SCOTT: Let him ask the question. 11 (Pages 217 to 220) www. phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010793