Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1798House OversightDeposition

The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assis...

The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded, as his defense team made strategic choices regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine Conrad, and that the evidence shows Parse was aware of and involved in the tax shelter transactions.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1798
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded, as his defense team made strategic choices regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine Conrad, and that the evidence shows Parse was aware of and involved in the tax shelter transactions.

Tags

Ineffective assistance of counsel claimDefense strategy regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine ConradDefendant Parse's knowledge and involvement in tax shelter transactions
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.