Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-18154House OversightOther

Legal filing argues discovery of Trump, Clinton, Dershowitz, and others in Epstein abuse case

The passage reveals that a plaintiff’s counsel is actively seeking deposition testimony from several high‑profile individuals linked to Jeffrey Epstein, indicating potential new evidence about the abu Plaintiff seeks discovery from Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, Bill Counsel argues the discovery standard is liberal and that each named individual likely possesses r

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013383
Pages
1
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals that a plaintiff’s counsel is actively seeking deposition testimony from several high‑profile individuals linked to Jeffrey Epstein, indicating potential new evidence about the abu Plaintiff seeks discovery from Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, Bill Counsel argues the discovery standard is liberal and that each named individual likely possesses r

Tags

potential-financial-flow-implijeffrey-epsteindiscoveryhighprofile-witnesseswitness-testimonyforeign-influence-due-to-interlegal-strategysexual-abuselegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4, Edwards is Entitled to Summary Judgment to the Extent His Claim is Based On Pursuit of Discovery Concerning Epstein’s Friends Because All Such Efforts Were Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Relevant and Admissible Testimony About Epstein’s Abuse of Minor Girls. Epstein has also alleged that Edwards improperly pursued discovery from some his close friends. Such discovery, Epstein claims, was improper because Edwards knew that these ined iets lacked any discoverable information about the sexual assault cases against Epstein. | Here again, Edwards is entitled to summary judgment, as each of the friends of Epstein were reasonably believed to possess discoverable information. The undisputed facts show the following with regard to each of the persons raised in Epstein’s complaint: | e With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. e With regard to Alan Dershowitz (Harvard Law Professor), Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Dershowitz had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. e With regard to former President Bill Clinton, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing former President Clinton had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. e With regard to former Sony Record executive Tommy Mottola, Edwards was not the attorney that noticed Mr. Mottola’s deposition. See Statement of Undisputed Facts, e With regard to illusionist David Copperfield, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Copperfield had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. e With regard to former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, Edwards had sound legal basis for naming Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson on his witness list. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. It is worth noting that the standard for discovery is a very liberal one. To notice someone for a deposition, of course, it is not required that the person deposed actually end up producing 14

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.