Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-183House OversightOther

The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, s...

The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, specifically addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's case. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition to the US is highly likely due to her breach of bail and the unlikelihood of successfully resisting extradition. The opinion also clarifies the limited grounds on which the Secretary of State can refuse extradition.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-183
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, specifically addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's case. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition to the US is highly likely due to her breach of bail and the unlikelihood of successfully resisting extradition. The opinion also clarifies the limited grounds on which the Secretary of State can refuse extradition.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Extradition law of England and WalesGhislaine Maxwell's extradition caseBars to extradition and human rights considerations
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Expert Opinion: 103-2

The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, specifically addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's case. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition to the US is highly likely due to her breach of bail and the unlikelihood of successfully resisting extradition. The opinion also clarifies the limited grounds on which the Secretary of State can refuse extradition.

4p
Court UnsealedOtherUnknown

Expert Opinion/Declaration: 201-07-003230-AdmitDocID010321

The document discusses the Secretary of State's exceptional power to bar extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 and notes that it has been exercised only once since the enactment of the Act. It also highlights the typical timescales for extradition proceedings arising from US requests. The author, David Perry QC, concludes that none of the bars or exceptions to extradition would arise in Ms Maxwell's case based on currently known information.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 20-cr-60838-AJNT Document 1032 Filed 06/23/23 Page 9 of 15

The document discusses the extradition of Ms. Maxwell, citing expert opinions from Mr. Julié and David Perry, which contradict the government's assertions on the likelihood of extradition from France and the U.K. It argues that extradition is legally permissible and likely under the relevant treaties and laws.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Expert Opinion/Legal Brief: 2016-08-03-Adj-Def-#110821, ECF#3187

The document discusses the UK's extradition law under the 2003 Act, highlighting exceptions and bars to extradition, and the rarity of the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition. It notes that extradition procedures are designed to be streamlined and typically conclude within two years. The author, David Perry QC, provides context for understanding the application of these laws in a specific case involving Ms Maxwell.

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00011192

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016788

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.