Jeffrey Epstein internal inquiry about post‑conviction activities and ties to high‑profile contacts
The email chain shows a request for a list of questions to ask Epstein about his current business, scientific foundation, prison work, and connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton. It identif Epstein’s alleged $15 billion client base is referenced as a metric to verify. Inquiry about his work while incarcerated suggests possible privileged arrangements. Questions about continued ties to G
Summary
The email chain shows a request for a list of questions to ask Epstein about his current business, scientific foundation, prison work, and connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton. It identif Epstein’s alleged $15 billion client base is referenced as a metric to verify. Inquiry about his work while incarcerated suggests possible privileged arrangements. Questions about continued ties to G
Persons Referenced (5)
“...10:38 AM To: Mike Sitrick aaaaaaaaammmeemes Subject: Fwd: Fw: a Forwarded message ---------- From: Jay Lefkowitz Date: Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM Subject: Fw: To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Darre...”
Martin Weinberg“...Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM Subject: Fw: To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Darren <>, Martin Weinberg —— EEE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfe, Alexandra" i | Sent: 03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST T...”
Ghislaine Maxwell“...ending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? -Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? -What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? -What does he think abo...”
Jeffrey Epstein“From: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: 3/8/2011 1:10:38 AM To: Mike Sitrick aaaaaaaaammmeemes Subject: Fwd:...”
Bill Clinton“...e story and have people been supportive? -Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
jeevacation@gmail.comRelated Documents (6)
Jeffrey Epstein attorney correspondence reveals inquiries about his post‑conviction activities, ties to science foundation, Bill Clinton charity wo...
The email chain shows a lawyer (Jay Lefkowitz) fielding detailed questions from a journalist/ researcher about Epstein’s current business, alleged $15 billion client base, prison work arrangements, an Alexandra Wolfe seeks answers on Epstein’s current focus, including the Jeffrey Epstein Science Foun Questions about whether Epstein still manages a $15 billion client portfolio and any new business
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.