Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-18504House OversightFinancial Record

Ken Starr to handle appeal of billion‑dollar J&J verdict, cites “good friends on both sides”

The email suggests a former high‑profile attorney (Ken Starr) is personally involved in an appeal of a massive J&J jury verdict, hinting at possible insider connections (“good friends on both sides”). Ken Starr indicates he will handle the appeal of a billion‑dollar J&J jury verdict. Mentions “good friends on both sides,” implying personal connections to plaintiffs and defendants. Email dated Dec

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032396
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The email suggests a former high‑profile attorney (Ken Starr) is personally involved in an appeal of a massive J&J jury verdict, hinting at possible insider connections (“good friends on both sides”). Ken Starr indicates he will handle the appeal of a billion‑dollar J&J jury verdict. Mentions “good friends on both sides,” implying personal connections to plaintiffs and defendants. Email dated Dec

Tags

pharmaceuticalsken-starrfinancial-flowpolitical-influencelegal-strategylitigationpolitical-connectionslegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ken Starr Sent: 12/25/2016 7:39:30 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: — High A prince art thou. Thank you. Just agreed to handle an appeal -- billion-dollar jury verdict in federal court against Johnson & Johnson. Get ready: Representing the hip-replacement plaintiffs. Good friends on both sides. Love ya. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 25, 2016, at 12:39 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: thx hope this year brings you true peace. you deserve it On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Ken Stari wrote: Hope Santa (swim trunks donned), reindeer and sleigh successfully made it southward. Yuletide hugs, Ken Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2016, at 5:59 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: if trump fully supports jasta , does that make the consitutional challenge moot? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01824206

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02610938

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: "Paul Cassell"

From: To: "Paul Cassell" Cc: ' "Brad Edwards" Subject: : ovemments osition on Several Pending Issues? Still Waiting for Answer Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:56:28 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, 1. Yesterday, I provided you with the name and phone number for OPR Acting Associate Counsel, who received your December 10, 2010 letter to Mr. Ferrer, asking for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution. 2. The government will not be making initial disclosures to plaintiffs, because we do not believe Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 applies to this matter. 3. The CVRA applies to the criminal case which has been filed in district court, where an individual is deemed to be a "victim," not any civil litigation which may be initiated to enforce those claimed rights. We do not believe there is any right to discovery in this case. Moreover, we do not believe that whatever Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez may have said to this office, or what this office said to Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann S

2p
House OversightUnknown

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement The passage links high‑profile figures (Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger) to alleged sexual exploitation of minors and suggests possible obstruction via a powerful legal team. It provides specific dates, alleged actions, and mentions lawsuits, offering concrete leads for further investigation (e.g., subpoena of attorney communications, review of police search evidence). While many details are already public, the editorial context adds new angles on legal strategy and potential financial motives. Key insights: Epstein allegedly used MySpace to recruit a 13‑year‑old and other minors.; Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and former prosecutor Kenneth Starr were on Epstein’s legal team.; Jack Goldberger reportedly told a columnist the case would end without trial within two months.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01875521

0p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.