Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-18569House OversightOther

Attorney Scott claims ongoing representation of Jeffrey Epstein and discusses privileged communications about alleged sexual misconduct

The transcript reveals a lawyer asserting he was Epstein's attorney during 2015 and referencing privileged conversations about alleged sexual contact with [REDACTED - Survivor]. This suggests possible undi Attorney Scott states he was Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer in January 2015. Scott references privileged attorney‑client and common‑interest communications with Epstein. He denies any basis for Virginia Ro

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010802
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The transcript reveals a lawyer asserting he was Epstein's attorney during 2015 and referencing privileged conversations about alleged sexual contact with [REDACTED - Survivor]. This suggests possible undi Attorney Scott states he was Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer in January 2015. Scott references privileged attorney‑client and common‑interest communications with Epstein. He denies any basis for Virginia Ro

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinlegal-testimonyattorney-client-privilegeprivileged-communicationpotential-evidence-concealmentlegal-exposuremoderate-importancesexual-misconduct-allegationshouse-oversightcongressional-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo Ow DU FP WN NNNNNN HPP PHP RPP RPP PE ne wWNP Ow @YH HB WNR OO wo Orn nM WN NNNNN NP PH PHP PP RP RB vob WN FF OO ON AM BW NP OD 253 BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Who told you that the manifests confirm the accuracy of your publie statements? MR. SCOTT: If it involves lawyer-client privilege, don't answer it. THE WITNESS: Okay. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. You're refusing to answer? A. No, I would like -- MR. SCOTT: Instruct you not to answer. A. -- to answer. But I've been instructed not to answer. I would like to answer. You've made a statement -- MR. SCOTT: There's no question pending. THE WITNESS: But he made a statement -- MR. SCOTT: But there's no question pending, sir. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. What does it mean to make something up out of whole cloth? A. It means that [REDACTED] and your clients -- Q. No, sir, | haven't asked you anything about [REDACTED]. | haven't asked you anything about my clients. Oo On HU WN PR NNNNNNPFP RF PR PPR PR UP WNP Ow OY HU PWN RO 255 MR. INDYKE: Objection. This is Darren. Anything that relates to your conversations with Jeffrey -- THE REPORTER: He's going to have to speak up. MR. SCOTT: You're going to have to speak up a little bit more, Counsel. MR. INDYKE: Objection. This is Darren Indyke. Anything that Alan might have to say to that, to the extent they are covered under conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, privileged under attorney-client privileges as well as common interest privileges. MR. SCOTT: Do you understand? THE WITNESS: I do. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. To which your response was: "Sure, sure, certainly I have been his lawyer and J did speak to him about it. I wanted to make sure that his memory and mine coordinated about when I was at his island. He was able to check. I was able to check. | checked with my friends who went with me." Did you make that answer to that question? A. Yes. Q. Disclosing the contents of your 254 1 want to know what the words "making something up out of whole cloth" mean. A. 1 said those words in the context of [REDACTED]. MR. SCOTT: That's -- that's fine. Go ahead. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. What do the words mean? A. That there was absolutely no basis for [REDACTED]' claim that she had any sexual contact with me. That the story was entirely false. I don't know where the metaphor derives about whole cloth, but certainly that's the common understanding. And I repeat under oath that [REDACTED] made up the entire story about having sexual contact with me out of whole cloth. Q. During the course of the same interview that we have been referencing with Hala Gorani —~ for the record, that's H-A-L-A, G-O-R-A-N-I. A. What page? Q. Page 19. You were asked: "I'm wondering, have you spoken to Jeffrey Epstein about this since these allegations came out in this suit in the United States? Have conversations happened there?" Oo On KH MP WN BP PRR PP Pe RH to OW HU PWN REO communication with Jeffrey Epstein, correct? A. I disclosed that | had spoken to him to find out whether he had any records of when | was on his island. And, yes. MR. INDYKE: Again, this is Darren Indyke. Jeffrey does not waive any attorney-client privileges here. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Well, the reason why you were able to answer that question and discuss with the press what Jeffrey Epstein was telling you was because you weren't his lawyer at that time, right? A. No, I was his lawyer at that time. I'm still his lawyer. Q. Oh, what were you representing him on then -- A. The ongoing -- Q. -- that is, on January -- MR. SCOTT: Whoa. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. -- on January 5, 2015? A. The ongoing -- MR. INDYKE: My objection stands. MR. SCOTT: You can answer what you were representing him on, | think. 20 (Pages 253 to 256) www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.phippsreporting.com
Phone(888) 811-3408
Wire Refreferencing

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.