The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] ...
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Summary
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Letter to the Court: doj-ogr-00010725
This letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, opposes the motion by [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] to give oral victim impact statements during Maxwell's sentencing, arguing they are not statutory crime victims under the CVRA.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 667
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor] do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's r...
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's response to delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail and arguing that the situation is untenable and violates Maxwell's constitutional rights. Sternheim requests the court to reconsider Maxwell's detention.
The memorandum of law supports the motion of two victims, [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor], to deli...
The memorandum of law supports the motion of two victims, [REDACTED - Survivor] and [REDACTED - Survivor], to deliver oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing, arguing that they have a statutory right to be heard under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The document details the harm caused by Maxwell's sex trafficking conspiracy and the victims' experiences.
Court Filing: 133
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.
Court Filing: 407
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.