Skip to main content
Skip to content
The document is a judgment in a criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing her conviction on...Bibliographic List from HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016076 Document
Case File
d-18980House OversightOther

Email urging silence on Jeffrey Epstein allegations and suggesting contact with Alan Dershowitz

The passage references Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz in a vague advisory context, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or specific wrongdoing. It hints at potential legal Sender advises the recipient to ignore Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and instead seek Alan Dershowitz’s c Mentions possible investigations and reputational risk if allegations are not publicly denied. All

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030296
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage references Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz in a vague advisory context, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or specific wrongdoing. It hints at potential legal Sender advises the recipient to ignore Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and instead seek Alan Dershowitz’s c Mentions possible investigations and reputational risk if allegations are not publicly denied. All

Persons Referenced (3)

Alan DershowitzPhilip Barden

“From: Philip Barden <> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000 To: 6 Mxwe Ce: Ross Gow <i - Subject: Re: All Tam bac...”

Jeffrey Epstein

“...back on line now. I see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow? I will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked...”

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinpotential-obstructionsex-abuse-allegationslegal-strategydefamationalan-dershowitzlegal-exposurehouse-oversightreputational-risk
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #030296

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Philip Barden <> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000 To: 6 Mxwe Ce: Ross Gow <i - Subject: Re: All Tam back on line now. I see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow? I will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked there is less heat on him. Either is lying or not. If we let her lie without challenge then the lies become the reality and that may lead to you facing investigation. These are serious allegations and In the UK prosecuting people who face allegations of sex abuse is now common place and a lot of resources are focused on this. We can't sit back and let you be a conspirator by silence. Your are not guilty and must follow Dershowtiz line. He is a leading lawyer and he hasn't followed the don't say anything for fear of litigation. He has rightly called Pe biutt and shouted his innocence. You have to stand up and deny the allegations or be branded guilty by association and that may lead to other investigations and worse. I feel I am going around in circles. I know what is right to do and that is to shout your innocence. Try and get some rest. Call me tomorrow if you want anytime. Speak to Deshowitz. Don't allay yourself to JE as that is not the way to go. Best Philip Sent from my iPhone On 10 Jan 2015, at 16:02, "G Maxwell" wrote: Iam out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don't want to end up in a law suit

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

United States District Court

2p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Sweet Opinion Unsealed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [REDACTED - Survivor], Giuffre, 15 Civ. 7433 ?against? SEALED .OPINION GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Maxwell. A A A S: Counsel for Giuffre BOIES, SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 By: Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Meredith L. Schultz, Esq. Counsel for Maxwell HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 By: Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq.

76p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

United States District Court

7p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

United States District Court

19p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop One

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.