Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19184House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked constitutional defenses to block discovery in civil suits alleging sexual abuse of minors

The passage details Epstein's obstruction tactics during civil discovery, providing specific dates, deposition excerpts, and attorney names. While it offers concrete leads for further investigation (e Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly to avoid answering substantive abuse questions. Depositions were taken at least five times, with excerpts dated March 8, 2010. Attorney Jeffrey Herman i

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010586
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage details Epstein's obstruction tactics during civil discovery, providing specific dates, deposition excerpts, and attorney names. While it offers concrete leads for further investigation (e Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly to avoid answering substantive abuse questions. Depositions were taken at least five times, with excerpts dated March 8, 2010. Attorney Jeffrey Herman i

Tags

jeffrey-epsteindiscovery-obstructionconstitutional-rightscivil-litigationsexual-abuseobstruction-of-justicelegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Epstein’s Obstruction of Normal Discovery and Attacks on His Victims 53. | Once Edwards filed his civil complaints for his three clients, he began the normal process of discovery for cases such as these. He sent standard discovery requests to Epstein about his sexual abuse of the minor girls, including requests for admissions, request for protinetion, and interrogatories. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N”, at {11-19 and 25. Rather than answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse and his conspiracy for procuring minor girls for him to abuse, Epstein invoked his 5th amendment right against self- incrimination. An example of Epstein’s refusal to answer is attached as Composite Exhibit “Z” (original discovery propounded to Epstein and his responses invoking Sth amendment). 54. During the discovery phase of the civil cases filed against Epstein, Epstein’s deposition was taken at least five times. During all of those depositions, Epstein refused to answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse of minor girls. See, e.g., Deposition Attachments 1, 6 and 7. 55. During these depositions, Epstein further attempted to obstruct legitimate questioning by inserting a variety of irrelevant information about his case. As one of innumerable examples, on March 8, 2010, Mr. Horowitz, representing seven victims, Jane Doe's 2-8, asked, "Q: In 2004, did you rub Jane Doe 3's vagina? A: Excuse me. I'd like to answer that question, as I would like to answer mostly every question you've asked me here today; however, upon advice of counsel, I cannot answer that question. They've advised me I must assert my Sixth Amendment, Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Rights against self--excuse me, against--under the Constitution. And though your partner, Jeffrey Herman, was disbarred after filing this lawsuit [a statement that was untrue], Mr. Edwards! partner sits in jail for 21

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.