Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19253House OversightOther

Giuffre sues Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation over alleged false campaign

The passage outlines a civil complaint alleging that Maxwell spread false statements to discredit Giuffre, but it provides no new factual leads, financial transactions, or connections to high‑level of Giuffre claims Maxwell defamed her to damage her reputation and impede her advocacy. The complaint seeks compensatory, exemplary, and punitive damages exceeding $75,000. Allegations tie Maxwell to se

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015541
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines a civil complaint alleging that Maxwell spread false statements to discredit Giuffre, but it provides no new factual leads, financial transactions, or connections to high‑level of Giuffre claims Maxwell defamed her to damage her reputation and impede her advocacy. The complaint seeks compensatory, exemplary, and punitive damages exceeding $75,000. Allegations tie Maxwell to se

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickingghislaine-maxwelldefamationcivil-litigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 11 of 12 non-profit foundation, or share her life story, and thereby help others who have suffered from sexual abuse. 18. Asa result of Maxwell’s campaign to spread false, discrediting and defamatory statements about Giuffre, Giuffre suffered substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial. 19. Maxwell’s false statements have caused, and continue to cause, Giuffre economic damage, psychological pain and suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress, and other direct and consequential damages and losses. 20. | Maxwell’s campaign to spread her false statements internationally was unusual and particularly egregious conduct. Maxwell sexually abused Giuffre and helped Epstein to sexually abuse Giuffre, and then, in order to avoid having these crimes discovered, Maxwell wantonly and maliciously set out to falsely accuse, defame, and discredit Giuffre. In so doing, Maxwell’s efforts constituted a public wrong by deterring, damaging, and setting back Giuffre’s efforts to help victims of sex trafficking. Accordingly, this is a case in which exemplary and punitive damages are appropriate. 21. | Punitive and exemplary damages are necessary in this case to deter Maxwell and others from wantonly and maliciously using a campaign of lies to discredit Giuffre and other victims of sex trafficking. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Giuffre respectfully requests judgment against Defendant Maxwell, awarding compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but in excess of the $75,000 jurisdictional requirement; costs of suit; attorneys’ fees; and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 11

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:15-CV-07433

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.