Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19266House OversightOther

Law Review Article on Victims' Rights Lacks Investigative Leads

The passage is a scholarly discussion of proposed amendments to federal criminal procedure rules and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. It contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actiona Discusses Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. References Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004. Calls for broader victim protections in federal courts.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017636
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a scholarly discussion of proposed amendments to federal criminal procedure rules and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. It contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actiona Discusses Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. References Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004. Calls for broader victim protections in federal courts.

Tags

law-reviewhouse-oversightfederal-criminal-procedurevictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules o Criminal Procedure 2007 Reporter 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 * Length: 59852 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to Sara Sun Beale, Doug Beloof, Doug Berman, Russell Butler, Matt Cannon, Meg Garvin, Nancy King, Erik Luna, Peter McCabe, Benjamin McMurray, Ross McPhail, Dan Medwed, Wendy Murphy, Daphne Oberg, Jim Oleson, Judge James Orenstein, Alice Ristroph, Greg Skordas, Felise Thorpe Moll, Steve Twist, Stewart Young, and especially my wife Trish. Text [*863] I. Introduction Federal courts should treat crime victims fairly in the criminal process. In a nod to that goal, the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Advisory Committee) has circulated for public comment proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (the Rules) regarding crime victims’ rights. These amendments attempt to implement the recently-enacted Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), | which guarantees crime victims a series of rights, including the right to be treated fairly. Unfortunately, the proposed amendments are mere tentative, half measures that do not begin to fully protect crime victims. This Article contends that the Advisory Committee should broaden its vision of the proper role for crime victims and recommend far more expansive victim protections. In the CVRA, Congress articulated specific rights for crime victims, such as the right to be notified of court hearings, to attend those hearings, and to speak at appropriate points in the process. * But along with these specific rights came the sweeping requirement that crime victims "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." * This congressional command must not be ignored. In addition, entirely apart from any congressional dictate, crime victims deserve fair treatment in the federal system. Acting for the federal judiciary, the Advisory Committee should make certain that the Rules fully reflect victims’ interests rather than allow the initiative for protecting victims to pass to other branches of government. This Article proceeds in five parts. Following this Introduction, Part II reviews events leading to the recently circulated amendments. The amendments were prompted by the CVRA - an act passed by Congress in 2004 to protect victims' rights through the federal criminal process. To comply with the CVRA, the federal criminal rules had to be amended in many places, ' Pub. L. No. 108-405, § 102(a), 178 Stat. 2260, 2261-62 (codified as amended at /8 U.S.C. § 3771 (Supp. 2006)). 2 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (a)(2)-(4). 3 Id. § 3771 (a)(8). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.