Skip to main content
Skip to content
Discussion of Fifth Amendment Assertions by Dershowitz and Epstein in Potential Abuse TestimonyNLRB Revises Union‑Related Notice Language After Public Comments
Case File
d-19297House OversightOther

Court scheduling discussion with Ms. McCawley and Mr. Pagliuca

The excerpt only details procedural scheduling of a hearing and a deposition conflict, with no substantive allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no actionab Ms. McCawley references a forensic review ordered on November 2nd. Potential hearing dates discussed: April 10th, 12th, and 19th. Mr. Pagliuca cannot attend on the 10th due to a deposition in Colorad

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011459
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt only details procedural scheduling of a hearing and a deposition conflict, with no substantive allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no actionab Ms. McCawley references a forensic review ordered on November 2nd. Potential hearing dates discussed: April 10th, 12th, and 19th. Mr. Pagliuca cannot attend on the 10th due to a deposition in Colorad

Tags

schedulinglegal-hearinghouse-oversightcourt-proceedings
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #011459

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 156 H3VOGIU3 MS. McCAWLEY: We just did that about the financial records, and you gave us some direction on that, so that one's been -—- THE COURT: Oh, okay. So that's done. Okay. So that's the 5th. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. So then there's April 12th, which I believe is the following Wednesday, and then I think the one after that is the 19th. THE COURT: Well, are we going to do a hearing -- I take it we're going to do a hearing on the reconsideration of the —-— MS. McCAWLEY: That's what I'm talking about, your Honor. I'm sorry. Yes. So that's the evidentiary issue of -- you said they could present a forensic, based on your order of reconsideration of the November 2nd. So that's the date I'm looking for. I'm sorry, I should have been clearer about that. THE COURT: When are we going to do that? MS. McCAWLEY: Maybe the 12th or the 19th possibly? lial |e COURT: How about the 10th. MS. McCAWLEY: Okay. THI Gl COURT: Does that work for you all? MR. PAGLIUCA: I can't do the 10th, your Honor, I'm in a deposition all day in Colorado. I'm sorry. THE COURT: How could you possibly take another case? MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, believe me, I have a lot of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.