Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1937House OversightLegal Filing

The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impe...

The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impeachment evidence against Kate, a prosecution witness, as it contradicts her testimony about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's home in 1994. The prosecution is objecting to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that the defense failed to disclose it in a timely manner.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1937
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impeachment evidence against Kate, a prosecution witness, as it contradicts her testimony about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's home in 1994. The prosecution is objecting to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that the defense failed to disclose it in a timely manner.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Ghislaine Maxwell trialDiscovery of 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton StreetImpeachment evidence against witness Kate
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.