Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1939House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a court filing by [REDACTED - Survivor]'s counsel, Sigrid McCawley, in response to the Depart...

The document is a court filing by [REDACTED - Survivor]'s counsel, Sigrid McCawley, in response to the Department of Justice's notice regarding the proposed disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein's and Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts. The filing supports the unsealing of the transcripts with redactions to protect victims' identities, citing the need for transparency and accountability in the case.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1939
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a court filing by [REDACTED - Survivor]'s counsel, Sigrid McCawley, in response to the Department of Justice's notice regarding the proposed disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein's and Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts. The filing supports the unsealing of the transcripts with redactions to protect victims' identities, citing the need for transparency and accountability in the case.

Tags

Unsealing of Grand Jury TranscriptsJeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's CrimesVictim's Rights and Transparency
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025469

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00590749

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 161 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 4

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.