The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, a...
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.
Summary
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01361573
Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers
January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c
EFTA Document EFTA01711655
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct
5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi
EFTA01442948
Epstein Drop Five
Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED - Survivor] Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.