Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19521House OversightOther

Interview excerpt discussing Islam, personal harassment, and vague law‑enforcement involvement

The passage contains no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details linking high‑level officials or institutions to wrongdoing. It merely references a personal harassment claim and vague Subject (DP) claims personal harassment by a Muslim who later committed suicide. Mentions law‑enforcement involvement but provides no specifics. Discussion focuses on academic views of Islam rather t

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028746
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details linking high‑level officials or institutions to wrongdoing. It merely references a personal harassment claim and vague Subject (DP) claims personal harassment by a Muslim who later committed suicide. Mentions law‑enforcement involvement but provides no specifics. Discussion focuses on academic views of Islam rather t

Tags

academic-interviewislamlaw-enforcementharassmentpersonal-harassmenthouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
three years. His PhD dissertation became his first book, Slave Soldiers and Islam (1981). Then his interest in purely academic subjects expanded to include modern Islam. He left the university because, as he told an interviewer from Harvard Magazine, he has “‘the simple politics of a truck driver, not the complex ones of an academic.” His story of being harassed through the legal system by a Muslim who later committed suicide was recently told in The American Spectator (“A Palestinian in Texas,”’ TAS, November 2012). He has been personally threatened but prefers not to talk about specifics except to note that law enforcement has been involved. I interviewed Pipes shortly before Christmas, when the Egyptians were voting on their new constitution. I started out by saying that the number of Muslims in the U.S. has doubled since the 9/11 attacks. DP: My career divides in two: before and after 9/11. In the first part I was trying to show that Islam is relevant to political concerns. If you want to understand Muslims, I argued, you need to understand the role of Islam in their lives. Now that seems obvious. If anything, there’s a tendency to over-emphasize Islam; to assume that Muslims are dominated by the Koran and are its automatons—which goes too far. You can’t just read the Koran to understand Muslim life. You have to look at history, at personalities, at economics, and so on. TB: Do you see the revival of [slam as a reality? DP: Yes. Half a century ago Islam was waning, the application of its laws became ever more remote, and the sense existed that Islam, like other religions, was in decline. Since then there has been a sharp and I think indisputable reversal. We’re all talking about Islam and its laws now. TB: At the same time you have raised an odd question: “Can Islam survive Islamism?” Can you explain that? DP: I draw a distinction between traditional Islam and Islamism. Islamism emerged in its modern form in the 1920s and is driven by a belief that Muslims can be strong and rich again if they follow the Islamic law severely and in its entirety. This is a response to the trauma of modern Islam. And yet this form of Islam is doing deep damage to faith, to the point that I wonder if Islam will ever recover.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.