Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19606House OversightOther

Dispute Over Access to Barcoded Exhibit Copies in House Oversight Hearing

The passage mentions a procedural disagreement about obtaining and copying barcoded exhibits, with minor references to individuals (Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern). It lacks concrete details on financial flo Party claims they have been denied access to exhibits. Exhibits are reportedly barcoded and identified by numbers. Requests for color laser copies and court reporter copies are discussed.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012505
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage mentions a procedural disagreement about obtaining and copying barcoded exhibits, with minor references to individuals (Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern). It lacks concrete details on financial flo Party claims they have been denied access to exhibits. Exhibits are reportedly barcoded and identified by numbers. Requests for color laser copies and court reporter copies are discussed.

Tags

document-handlingcourt-documentsprocedural-disputelegal-exposureexhibit-accesshouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
oo 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —_ oO OO OD NN OD oO FF WwW YN ~0929104 .TXT very clear. Since for whatever reason | have not been able to look at exhibits because they have been refused to have been shown to me -- MR. TEIN: That's a lie. MR. LEOPOLD: Jack, if you represent that the documents have the appropriate exhibit numbers or some identifying markings, 25, 30.000, whatever they may be, then you can take them, make copies, send me a copy, make sure the court reporter gets a copy and then send me a bill for my copy, that's fine. | didn't know that they are marked that way because | haven't been able to look at them. MR. GOLDBERGER: They are barcoded and the number that we've made reference to in the deposition coincides with the barcoding. MR. LEOPOLD: That's fine. Eight by eleven color laser copies are fine. 129 MS. BELOHLAVEK: The State Attorneys Office iS not going to charge anybody for color copies | print out. MR. LEOPOLD: That's fine. He's going to take them back to his office . Secondly -- and | will be more than happy to do it, because it sounds !ike you all know more about it than |, but |'m happy to get affidavits from Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern, everybody else about what happened with this hearing today, because | know very [ittle about it. But my representations are what they are. MR. GOLDBERGER: They stay -- Page 110

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

House Oversight hearing excerpt reveals possible undisclosed cell phone evidence and questions about financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein

The passage hints that a cell phone, potentially containing incriminating data, was handed to Michelle Pagan and not returned, and raises the question of how much money a witness hopes to receive from Witness gave a cell phone to Michelle Pagan several years ago and has not recovered it. The cell phone could contain communications relevant to ongoing investigations. The line of questioning probes

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Incoherent Deposition Transcript with Casual Text Message Reference

The excerpt contains fragmented dialogue from a deposition and a personal text message with no clear connection to any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It lacks specific name Deposition includes vague references to a serious testimony but no substantive content. A casual text message mentions MySpace and personal affection, unrelated to any official matter. No high‑profil

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling

The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition excerpt shows heated exchange among attorneys with no substantive allegations

The passage is a routine courtroom deposition transcript featuring lawyers arguing over procedure. It contains no names of influential actors, no financial or misconduct details, and offers no actiona The excerpt records a dispute between attorneys (Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold) about taking No mention of any high‑profile individuals, agencies, or controversial actions. The content is pro

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett

The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.