Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19636House OversightOther

Dershowitz claims flight logs exonerate him from alleged encounters with [REDACTED - Survivor] on Epstein island

The passage contains a direct claim by a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) that flight logs prove he was not on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, plane, or Palm Beach property during the times alleged b Dershowitz asserts flight logs show he was never on Epstein’s island, plane, or Palm Beach home duri He claims the logs have not been produced and that [REDACTED - Survivor] has refused to supply timefram

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010800
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a direct claim by a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) that flight logs prove he was not on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, plane, or Palm Beach property during the times alleged b Dershowitz asserts flight logs show he was never on Epstein’s island, plane, or Palm Beach home duri He claims the logs have not been produced and that [REDACTED - Survivor] has refused to supply timefram

Tags

foreign-influence-epsteins-intjeffrey-epsteinflight-logsdiscoveryfinancial-flow-potential-flighsexual-misconduct-allegationlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightlegal-testimonysexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
po on Am FF WN EH ON NN NY NY FF FP FP FP FP RFP Pr re WU BPW NY FF OM ON H MO Pw NY PO 245 that you were in the same place at the same time A. First -- Q. --as [REDACTED]? MR. SCOTT: Let him ask the question. THE WITNESS: Okay. MR. SCOTT: Then you answer the question. And Mr. Searola will try to, you know, keep the emotion down, I'm sure, so we can get through this with less acrimony between everybody here. A. Your client has adamantly refused, as well as the lawyer -- BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. No, sir, that's nonresponsive to my question. MR. SCOTT: Wait a minute. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. My question is: Do you deny that the flight logs corroborate that you were in the same place at the same time as [REDACTED]? A. So the question includes the word "time" and, therefore, I must answer in this way. Your client -- Q. How to build a watch? MR. SCOTT: Wait a minute, you're cutting him off. He's been trying to answer the Oo On DM B® WN FE NNNNNN PRP BP PB PP eH PB ob WN HF OO OT AW BW NH Oo 247 I would be very anxious to see any timeframes when [REDACTED] claims she was with me on the island, claims she was with me on -- at the ranch, claims she was with me on the airplanes, claims she was with me in Palm Beach. And they will all conclusively -- . You forgot -- -- prove -- . «New York. Didn't you mean New York . No, I did not mean New York -- . Oh, okay. . +- because New York is very different. I was, in fact, in New York for large periods of time. I was not, in fact, on the island during the relevant timeframe. I was not in the airplane in the relevant timeframe. I was not in Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home in the relevant timeframe. And I was once in the ranch but under circumstances where it would have been absolutely impossible for me to have had any contact with her. So if you will give me the timeframe, I will be happy to answer your question. But without timeframes, that question is an absolutely inappropriate question. And the answer to if is no. ot 246 question. A. Your client has adamantly refused, and her lawyers and your clients have refused to give me any timeframes, any timeframes when your clicnt claims that she had improper -- falsely claims, perjuriously claims that she had improper sexual encounters with me. So how can you possibly ask me a question that includes the word "timeframes" when your client has refused -- when [REDACTED] has refused to give any timeframes? How can it be possible that the flight logs show me being in the same time and saine place with her when she has refused to describe any of the times that she claims to have been in those places? So the answer to the question is categorically no, sir. BY MR, SCAROLA: Q. What is the question that you are answering no to? A. Whether or not the timeframe shows that I could have been in the samc placc at the same time as your client. Absolutcly not. Because we don't know what times your client -- now, if you know that, you should have produced them in discovery and on ODN DM FWD NNNNN NF PHP RP BB Oe eB OP WN OHM DBIYAMH BwWN RB 248 Q. Well, Mr. Dershowitz, it might be inappropriate if you had not repeatedly made the public statements that the flight logs exonerate you. A. They do. Q. So what I am attempting to find out is the basis upon which you can contend that the flight logs exonerate you if you are now telling us you don't even know when it is that you are alleged to have been in the same place at the same time as [REDACTED]. A. Okay. Q. So how -- how can you make both those statements? A. Very simple, because I know the timeframe that [REDACTED], A, knew Jeffrey Epstein. And during that timeframe, I can conclusively prove that 1 was never on Jeffrey Epstein's island where she claimed to have sex with me. That the only time | was at the ranch was with my wife, with the Ashe family, with my daughter, the house was under construction, we just simply stayed outside the house and looked around. That the manifests show | was never on Jeffrey Epstein's plane during that period of time. And the manifests show that I never 18 (Pages 245 to 248) www.phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.phippsreporting.com
Phone(888) 811-3408

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.