Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20157House OversightOther

NY Post reporter requests sealed court brief in Epstein case, DA office cites victim confidentiality

The passage reveals that a sealed briefing related to the Epstein case exists and is being withheld under civil‑rights confidentiality provisions, indicating the presence of undisclosed victim informa A sealed court brief (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471) is referenced in the Epstein investigation. The DA office cites Civil Rights Law § 50‑b to block public access, indicating victim identities are Reporter

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016471
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals that a sealed briefing related to the Epstein case exists and is being withheld under civil‑rights confidentiality provisions, indicating the presence of undisclosed victim informa A sealed court brief (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471) is referenced in the Epstein investigation. The DA office cites Civil Rights Law § 50‑b to block public access, indicating victim identities are Reporter

Tags

victim-confidentialitycourt-sealcourt-document-concealmentvictim-identificationmanhattan-district-attorneylegal-exposurehouse-oversightfoiaepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Thanks. Can you send me a POF of the cover page? Who issued that order? We always get such court documents -- with the names and ID of victims redacted. The whole document is not withheld. Sue Susan Edelman Reporter 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10036 917-584-7675 sedelman@nypost.com On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:28 PM Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov> wrote: Hi Sue — I’ve confirmed that the brief is filed under seal. It contains the following header on the cover page: “Pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, the identities of the victims, who are the victims of sex offenses, shall be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection.” Accordingly we must decline your request. Thanks. Danny Frost Director of Communications Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, Jr. 212-335-9400 // @ManhattanDA From: Susan Edelman [mailto:sedelman@nypost.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:34 PM To: Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov> Subject: request Hi Danny, Following up on the Epstein case:

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailfrostd@dany.nyc.gov
Emailsedelman@nypost.com
Phone212-335-9400
Phone917-584-7675

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01652205

0p
House OversightUnknown

NY Post reporter denied access to sealed House Oversight document by Manhattan DA communications director

NY Post reporter denied access to sealed House Oversight document by Manhattan DA communications director The passage only reveals a request for a sealed document and a refusal to provide it, without any substantive details about the content, actors, or alleged misconduct. It suggests a possible avenue (petitioning the court) but lacks concrete leads, names, dates, or transactions. Key insights: A sealed document related to House Oversight was requested by a NY Post reporter.; Danny Frost, Director of Communications for Manhattan DA Cy Vance Jr., refused to release the document.; The reporter cites legal allowance for redaction of victim names, not full denial.

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026618

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01652050

11p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Manhattan DA Office confirms routine sealing of appellate sex‑crime filings, including People v. Epstein

The email reveals that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office routinely files appellate sex‑crime matters under seal, explicitly referencing the high‑profile People v. Epstein case. While it does no DA’s communications director confirms that appellate filings in sex‑crime cases are routinely sealed The practice applies to the People v. Epstein case, a matter of significant public interest. The D

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01652596

16p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.