Skip to main content
Skip to content
Email from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein referencing Trump and DershowitzForwarded NYT stock article notification with no substantive content
Case File
d-20251House OversightOther

Allegations linking IBM executives and the Gunther family to alleged murder cover‑up, child sexual exploitation, and claims of Deep State involvement

The passage makes a series of unverified, sensational accusations involving IBM, unnamed officials, and high‑profile figures (Ken Starr, Jeffrey Epstein). It provides no concrete evidence, dates, or t Plaintiff alleges IBM executives (Palmi so, Skoog, Scala) caused her miscarriage through malicious c Claims that John and Avery Gunther assisted IBM in defending a murder allegation and later profite

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015024
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage makes a series of unverified, sensational accusations involving IBM, unnamed officials, and high‑profile figures (Ken Starr, Jeffrey Epstein). It provides no concrete evidence, dates, or t Plaintiff alleges IBM executives (Palmi so, Skoog, Scala) caused her miscarriage through malicious c Claims that John and Avery Gunther assisted IBM in defending a murder allegation and later profite

Persons Referenced (2)

Jeffrey Epstein

“...he Deep State. Now it is simply a matter of the Deep State continuing to put the NSF to use. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled B...”

Kenneth Starr

“...the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtab...”

Tags

deep-state-conspiracydeep-statejeffrey-epsteinken-starrsexual-exploitationforeign-influenceibmlegal-filingnsflegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #015024

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
defendants, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the plaintiff and her unborn child. ... 69. As the direct and proximate result of defendant Palmisano, Skoog, Susan Horton, and Scala's conduct, the plaintiff suffered a severe placental abruption, which terminated her pregnancy and ended the life of her unborn child, causing the plaintiff to suffer damages including but not limited to the loss of her child, loss of affection, grief, sorrow, extreme mental torment and emotional distress. - Initial Complaint, filed 5/16/11, McGuire v. IBM, et al, Case No.: 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia - Eastern Division, Alexandria, Judge Leonie Brinkema presiding This is to say that John and Avery Gunther helped IBM defend against an allegation of murder, and in this way they are accomplices to a cover-up. This is also to say that the characterization provided by John and Avery Gunther in their April 2011 Superior Court filing for a Protection Order against me and their admissions in this filing of having provided derogatory information to various persons and/or entities in the DC area to include school administrators, psychologists, and law enforcement, were more to harm me, especially in my chances to hold IBM accountable, than to protect either themselves or children Anjulee and Xian Gunther. | also long-allege that the relationship that developed from this initial quid pro quo led to John and Avery Gunther being similarly compensated for what turned into the sexual exploitation of their two daughters. For more on child sexual exploitation for the sake of personal and professional leverage, see especially the following: Nick Bryant | The Franklin Scandal & The Elite’s Pedophilia Cover Up, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68qvGGPjm0o0&t=978s That the NSF won't acknowledge the abuse, and won't respond even to my FOIA requests, and otherwise has gone to extents to protect Cathie Skoog and her co-conspirators at IBM and otherwise is all that was needed to have adequately turned the organization towards the interests of the Deep State. Now it is simply a matter of the Deep State continuing to put the NSF to use. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? | say this from the following perspective - Ken Starr of the Starr Report, attorney for (1) Erik Prince of Blackwater and (2) convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in context: The Starr Report buried behind salacious detail of the Lewinsky affair almost nothing of Whitewater, Travelgate, or otherwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange considering the Lewinsky affair was a moral failing and not an actionable criminal one as would have been the others had any proof surfaced.

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:11CV528
URLhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68qvGGPjm0o0&t=978s

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01812018

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' To:' . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN > (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:54:49 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey M— I am going to come down tomorrow to gather the boxes and talk with M. He has some ideas on the indictment. Are you free for a non-Epstein coffee? Just to get out of the office? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda January 09, 2008 4:44 PM To: Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Subject: Epstein . (USAFLS) We just informed Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Starr that CEOS will provide a lawyer to join the SDFL team regarding Jeffrey Epstein. We advised that that lawyer will be an expert in the area and, more importantly, someone who has a national perspective concerning these matters. We also advised them that the CEOS lawyer will begin to review the investigative materials and defense submissions to determine how best to proceed. Lefkowitz said that he believes that is a fair way to proceed and requested that the CEOS lawyer contact him to a

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01814412

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.