Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20291House OversightOther

DOJ FCPA Opinion Letter Procedures and Limitations

The passage outlines internal DOJ guidelines for handling FCPA opinion letters and their limited legal effect. It contains no specific names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actor FCPA opinion letters are not binding on agencies other than DOJ. Requests for opinions must be in writing and signed by the Attorney General or designee. DOJ may rebut presumptions of reliance on its

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022622
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines internal DOJ guidelines for handling FCPA opinion letters and their limited legal effect. It contains no specific names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actor FCPA opinion letters are not binding on agencies other than DOJ. Requests for opinions must be in writing and signed by the Attorney General or designee. DOJ may rebut presumptions of reliance on its

Tags

legal-guidanceopinion-lettersdojlegal-procedureregulatory-guidancehouse-oversightfcpa

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
purporting to limit the enforcement discretion of the Department of Justice may be given. The requesting issuer or domestic concern may rely only upon a written FCPA opinion letter signed by the Attorney General or his designee.”). “528 C.KR. § 80.8. FCPA opinions do not bind or obligate any agency other than DOJ. They also do not affect the requesting party’s obligations to any other agency or under any statutory or regulatory provision other than those specifically cited in the particular FCPA opinion. 28 C.ER. § 80.11. Ifthe conduct for which an FCPA opinion is requested is subject to approval by any other agency, such FCPA opinion may not be taken to indicate DOJ’s views on any legal or factual issues before that other agency. 28 C.ER. § 80.13. 41628 C.RR. § 80.10. DOJ can rebut this presumption by a preponderance of the evidence. A court determining whether the presumption has been rebutted weighs all relevant factors, including whether the submitted information was accurate and complete and the activity was within the scope of conduct specified in the request. Td. As of September 2012, DOJ has never pursued an enforcement action against a party for conduct that formed the basis of an FCPA opinion stating that the prospective conduct would violate DOJ’s present enforcement policy. 47 Asa general matter, DOJ normally anonymizes much of the information in its publicly released opinions and includes the general nature and circumstances of the proposed conduct. DOJ does not release the identity of any foreign sales agents or other types of identifying information. 28 C.ER. § 80.14(b). However, DOJ may release the identity of the requesting party, the foreign country in which the proposed. conduct is to take place, and any actions DOJ took in response to the FCPA opinion request. Jd. Ifa party believes that an opinion contains proprietary information, it may request that DOJ remove or anonymize those portions of the opinion before it is publicly released. 28 CER. § 80.14(c). 41898 CER. § 80.16. 120

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.