Skip to main content
Skip to content
NLRB Board Declines to Expand Employee Rights Notice in 2011 RulemakingConfidential disclaimer with no substantive content
Case File
d-20426House OversightOther

Courtroom transcript shows scheduling discussion, no substantive allegations

The excerpt contains only procedural dialogue about hearing dates and a brief mention of an 'Epstein motion' without any details on actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers no actionable lead Discussion of scheduling hearings on Wednesdays Reference to an 'Epstein motion' and financial records No substantive allegations or evidence presented

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011458
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt contains only procedural dialogue about hearing dates and a brief mention of an 'Epstein motion' without any details on actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers no actionable lead Discussion of scheduling hearings on Wednesdays Reference to an 'Epstein motion' and financial records No substantive allegations or evidence presented

Tags

court-transcripthouse-oversightproceduralepstein
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #011458

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 155 H3VOGIU3 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, there's just one more thing procedurally, if I could indulge the Court while I have your attention before we all leave. That would be helpful. THE COURT: Don't €eunt of. Le. Gi MS. McCAWLEY: Sorry. THE COURT: Yes. ES MS. McCAWLEY: It's just, in your order about the ESI and the issue with the non-production, you said that we should suggest hearing dates. I see that your Honor has moved the hearing dates to Wednesdays, so we were hoping to, since there's only a few Wednesdays left before our trial, reserve one of those to handle that hearing? THI Gl COURT: Well, I'm not sure. MS. McCAWLEY: Or whatever day would work. THI Gl COURT: No. Okay. Now, it seems to me, correct me if I'm wrong, on the 5th we're going to do Epstein's motion, the deposition designations, the biforcation -- MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry, we just did that. THE COURT: By the way, maybe we could do the biforcation issue very quickly. What is it you want to -- MR. CASSELL: I think we just did that a few moments ago, your Honor. MS. McCAWLEY: That was the one about the financial 15 records. = THE COURT: By what? es SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.